First things first: I found the faces in Brave incredibly creepy. Especially Merda's. And this is really the first time the faces in an animated feature have bothered me like this. Sorry, that's an entirely subjective thing, but I just wanted to get that out there.
Anyways, on with the review.
Brave is not the dark, epic fantasy that pixar tried to pass it off as. Yeah, it is a fantasy, but the fantasy aspects are very underplayed when they could have been great. The underplaying of the fantasy also hurts the epic part of it. And dark? Sure, the palet choices for the film were often pointlessly gloomy. (Note: don't watch it in 3d. The glasses darken an already dark looking film.) Still, the actual plot of the movie isn't really that grim at all. So yeah, it's not a dark epic fantasy. it's a mother daughter bonding flick.
But, y'know, that isn't necessarily a bad thing. If anyone could make that work it's Pixar, they're pretty good with character driven stuff like that. But... they don't make it work. And don't get me wrong, there is some good stuff in the film. Unfortunately, it is all contained in a bland, vague shell that just stinks of them not caring.
And you know what? I think that's the problem. When they were conceptualizing Brave they were conceptualizing it as "a film with a female protagonist." Not how they should have conceptualized it, as y'know, "a good film." It was really important that it had a female protagonist! That was the main focus of the film! So, of course, when developing the film the reached for stereotypical female plots and the film fell into all these formulaic clichés based around the fact that the PROTAGONIST was FEMALE!
Because they cared more about the protagonist being female than the film being good.
So the result just feels...
22nd Jun 12
I thought the movie was focused less on the fact that the protagonist is female, and more on its actual themes: learning to think of others (which means allowing people to forge their own path through life), while also accepting responsibility for your actions.
22nd Jun 12
I wish I could read one review where that doesn't freak out about the protagonist being *gasp* a girl.
31st Oct 12
I saw the movie Ark (looks like the Final Fantasy movies), and the Polar Express, they had weirder faces to me, but, as you say, it is subjective. Now, The Dark Adventure thing really bothered me, it isn't a dark Epic Adventure, they shouldn't have promoted it as such, it was a comedic mother-daughter flick, the trailers played that up more, and I think it should have been solicited as such. The advertising should be held against it, but it should be judged on what it is, and I have mixed feelings about what it is. Also, I rarely watch movies in 3d, it gives me a head ache, sometimes, but the films always get darker, and I don't like that, especially with a film with dark night scenes, like Brave. Plot-wise, I don't think it was a plot centered around the Character being female, though that is a big part of the plot, Frankly we could debate the originality of the plot all day. All in all the review gets your points across, but I feel you can elaborate on the Movie only being about a protagonist who was female.
2nd Nov 12
15th Nov 12
Well, I read a lot about the film's development and above all, I read what Brenda Chapman said about her movie later on. And frankly, I want to punch her in the face for congratulating herself that she created the supposedly kick-ass Disney princess who doesn't marry at the end of the movie, the Disney princess who finally got away from the princess in pretty dresses cliché. Which is the biggest BS ever.
1. She is confusing the line-up with the actual princess movies.
2. Mulan and Rapunzel are both ten times more kick-ass than Merida - AND have a way better character development.
3. It's not really a big deal to not have a love interest when the only men in your universe are buffoons...and the first princess who decided against marriage (despite being in love) was Pocahontas.
I think the reviewer hit the nail on the head. The makers were so invested to make the "better" female protagonist that they forgot to simply tell a good story. And in the end, they took a big step back. Merida is pretty much like the "I want" princesses of the 90s...which were okay for the 90s, but we are now in the 2010. We should be above writing characters as "female" by now and instead just write them as characters. Tangled for example is the way more feminist movie, simply because it features a protagonist whose gender is absolutely secondary during the whole movie. Same with Wreck-it-Ralph, btw. Venellope could be a boy, it wouldn't make any difference for the plot. Why is it that Disney gets that but Pixar starts to stumble the moment it elevates a female character from being the sidekick, despite having tons of great female characters in secondary roles in other movies? I guess they are simply trying to hard.
26th Jun 13
28th Jun 13
you feminazis need to chill (and this is coming from a fellow female) . . . the reviewer's point is not that s/he was bothered by the fact that the protagonist was female, but that the selling point and central focus of the movie seemed to be simply OUR PROTAGONIST IS FEMALE. It's sort of like Avatar, where the plot and character development are scrapped for the sake of beating the audience in the head with an eco-friendly message. I think that was the issue with Brave; they were so obsessed with making this super cool, rock 'em sock 'em, suffragette type female character that they turned Merida into a crude, bland caricature and forgot about the plot and supporting characters along the way. It doesn't matter *what* the character is if his/her development, as well as the plot's, isn't executed well.
8th Jul 13
8th Jul 13
In order to post comments, you need to