Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / EasyLogistics

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 11:10:37 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Misused, started by Peteman on Jul 9th 2012 at 2:48:14 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Emberfist Supreme Overlord of Luxemburg Since: Nov, 2018
Supreme Overlord of Luxemburg
Jan 31st 2019 at 7:20:55 AM •••

Just how would fuel suddenly becoming relevant in The Last Jedi go under this trope? On one hand the fact that they acknowledge it would make it an aversion, however the fact that the first order who are supposed to be this small splinter group of the empire never seem to run into these problems either plays it straight or the entire fuel situation of the Resistance is actually an inversion since all capital ships in Star Wars run on reactors and the closest real life equivalent, The Nimitz-class Aircraft Carrier can go between 20-25 years without going back to port to refuel. That is not even getting into cases such as the Katana Fleet from the Thrawn Trilogy which spent maybe 30-40 minimum laying dormant before the events of the books.

I am one with the force. the force is with me
PolarPhantom Since: Jun, 2012
May 31st 2014 at 4:45:19 PM •••

So, regarding the Modern Warfare 2 example, while it is a headscratcher as to where the enemies get their fuel, can't they just steal the food they need from American towns and cities they invade? Hell, you even encounter a soldier raiding an abandoned house's fridge pretty early on if memory serves correctly.

Hide / Show Replies
Emberfist Since: Nov, 2018
Jan 31st 2019 at 5:50:56 AM •••

you are right and I am planning on expanding on the footnote to bring up how most of the war crimes mentioned that happened in the Modern Warfare 3 happened after Markorov kidnapped the Russian President and murdered his cabinet. Plus said President was trying was attempting to end the war peacefully well before then. He was kidnapped on the way to a peace summit and the first mission after the European Invasion was saving the US Vice President who was also heading to that same summit. The only thing that isn't covered by this is the invasion of the US where the only war crime was attacking an Evacuation Site (still bad but there were soldiers there) and the destruction of the International Space Station which was Captain Price not the Russians and was an unintended side-effect of the EMP Price used

I am one with the force. the force is with me
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
May 1st 2017 at 11:32:06 AM •••

While I was doing Example Indentation clean up, I came across this example, which I removed:

  • In the Harry Potter Expanded Universe, different wizarding schools serve vastly different-sized areas. While Hogwarts only serves the UK, Uagodou serves all of Africa while Ilvermorny serves all of North America. Though it's unclear what percentage of the human population has magic, this still leaves individual schools serving populations several times larger than Hogwarts.

It's incorrect because these are not the only wizarding schools, just the largest and most prestigious. It's like saying Stanford serves all of the west coast; it's not quite wrong, but it's not completely accurate, either.

PolarPhantom Since: Jun, 2012
May 31st 2014 at 4:45:21 PM •••

Deleted.

Edited by 139.222.201.189
DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
Jul 30th 2013 at 11:14:58 PM •••

Delete please; Double-post.

Edited by 216.99.32.43 Ketchum's corollary to Clarke's Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced tactic is indistinguishable from blind luck.
DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
Jul 30th 2013 at 11:14:54 PM •••

I am sorely tempted to add the following as a general point to the Real Time Strategy folder (Notes in single brackets):

In most cases in this genre, [as this genre usually conducts its missions over the course of 1-2 in-game (Earth) days in an area the size of a city,] the units themselves can be considered an example as, given unlimited funds and sufficient upkeep (and headcount) margin, one can crank out any number of grunts from a Barracks facility over the course of a mission with no evidence of in-battle troop reinforcement whatsoever. Tiberium and minerals may be refinable to make metal alloys for the vehicles and guns, but they would seem unsuitable for growing the actual meatbags that use them. Furthermore, these units can be produced at any Barracks, regardless of said Barracks' proximity to the front. This latter point shoots down the Hand Wave that the meatbags were deployed in advance; to which Barracks (yet to be built) would they have been assigned?[The fact that they can be trained to fulfill any role falls under Instant Expert.] Note that this item does not apply to factions where Send in the Clones or teleportation is given as an in-story "recruitment" process.

Edited by 216.99.32.43 Ketchum's corollary to Clarke's Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced tactic is indistinguishable from blind luck.
ringhloth Since: Feb, 2012
Aug 5th 2012 at 2:21:11 AM •••

I don't know about anyone else, but the Total War series doesn't really seem to avert this trope. Three examples are provided: ammo, exhaustion, and upkeep. Ammo is more an example of averting bottomless magazines, because even though they run out during battle, firing arrows has no effect on the grand strategy parts; as for exhaustion, it doesn't seem to be easy logistics, not really calling the idea of supply lines to thought; upkeep is the closest thing, but even then you can supply a unit on the exact opposite end of the map. This is handwaved by pillaging, but food isn't the only thing you need to supply an army, and considering your army can easily live off of food pillaged from the Sahara, the logistics isn't exactly difficult.

Hide / Show Replies
ringhloth Since: Feb, 2012
Aug 5th 2012 at 2:25:46 AM •••

Actually, rereading, almost all of the "aversions" are really just examples of games handwaving supplies with upkeep. To say that upkeep accounts for a large portion of logistics in invading is an awful joke. There is never a mention of how that supply gets to the front.

Peteman Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 8th 2012 at 5:27:55 PM •••

Ooooookay, there seem to be more cases of aversions and subversions than there are actual examples. Should we make a Logistics In Fiction trope just because people taking into account logistics is so prevalent?

Top