Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

MasterHero Since: Aug, 2014
20th May, 2018 01:41:23 PM

I don't know how much about those movies but Darkness-Induced Audience Apathy applies when all sides involved in those stories' central conflict are all equally unlikeable, so no matter who wins, the universe will sucks. Alternatively, the movies can have heroes but their efforts amount to nothing and the universe still sucks. If those movies have clearly defined heroes and villains and their stories deliver positive outcomes, then the trope is averted, regardless of public opinion.

AnonymousBosch Since: May, 2016
20th May, 2018 01:42:57 PM

Well, last I checked, Rocky V has the trope on its YMMV page.

Zyffyr Since: Apr, 2010
20th May, 2018 04:30:40 PM

"Some other page used it wrong" is not an argument for using it wrong on other pages. It is an argument for removing it from that other page.

Reymma Since: Feb, 2015
20th May, 2018 04:48:36 PM

If it's merely too much focus on angst, that should go under Angst Aversion. DIAA could qualify if there was a lot of hardship with no payoff. If the cast suffer but come out as winners, it would not fit, whatever else might drive off audiences. Could you quote what some of the critics said about them?

Stories don't tell us monsters exist; we knew that already. They show us that monsters can be trademarked and milked for years.
AnonymousBosch Since: May, 2016
20th May, 2018 05:07:58 PM

I haven't seen The Pick-Up Artist or Betsy's Wedding, but Leonard Maltin's review for the former describes it as "dismal, dour, and deadeningly dull" and filled with "standard James Toback lowlifes". If I remember correctly, Siskel and Ebert panned Betsy's Wedding for its dearth of sympathetic or interesting characters. In constructing the entry, I was mainly going off of my viewings of For Keeps and Fresh Horses. Both films had a ton of misfortune heaped upon Ringwald's characters, especially the former, but instead being meaningfully angsty, they came off as kind of mean-spirited and alienated critics and audiences who were more accustomed to her lighter John Hughes efforts. It didn't help that Ringwald's characters became more and more unappealing; indeed, a good portion of Fresh Horses consists of her violently bickering with Andrew Mccarthy and being a clingy, egotistical lunatic.

Edited by AnonymousBosch
Top