During the investigation of recent hollers in the Complete Monster thread, it's become apparent to the staff that an insular, unfriendly culture has evolved in the Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard threads that is causing problems.
Specific issues include:
- Overzealous hollers on tropers who come into the threads without being familiar with all the rules and traditions of the tropes. And when they are familiar with said rules and traditions, they get accused (with little evidence) of being ban evaders.
- A few tropers in the thread habitually engage in snotty, impolite mini-modding. There are also regular complaints about excessive, offtopic "socializing" posts.
- Many many thread regulars barely post/edit anywhere else, making the threads look like they are divorced from the rest of TV Tropes.
- Following that, there are often complaints about the threads and their regulars violating wiki rules, such as on indexing, crosswicking, example context and example categorization. Some folks are working on resolving the issues, but...
- Often moderator action against thread regulars leads to a lot of participants suddenly showing up in the moderation threads to protest and speak on their behalf, like a clique.
It is not a super high level problem, but it has been going on for years and we cannot ignore it any longer. There will be a thread in Wiki Talk to discuss the problem; in the meantime there is a moratorium on further Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard example discussion until we have gotten this sorted out.
Update: The new threads have been made and can be found here:
Please see the Frequently Asked Questions and Common Requests List before suggesting any new entries for this trope.
IMPORTANT: To avoid a holler to the mods, please see here for the earliest date a work can be discussed, (usually two weeks from the US release), as well as who's reserved discussion.
When voting, you must specify the candidate(s). No blanket votes (i.e. " to everyone I missed").
No plagiarism: It's fair to source things, but an effortpost must be your own work and not lifted wholesale from another source.
We don't care what other sites think about a character being a Complete Monster. We judge this trope by our own criteria. Repeatedly attempting to bring up other sites will earn a suspension.
What is the Work
Here you briefly describe the work in question and explain any important setting details. Don't assume that everyone is familiar with the work in question.
Who is the Candidate and What have they Done?
This will be the main portion of the Effort Post. Here you list all of the crimes committed by the candidate. For candidates with longer rap sheets, keep the list to their most important and heinous crimes, we don't need to hear about every time they decide to do something minor or petty.
Do they have any Mitigating Factors or Freudian Excuse?
Here you discuss any potential redeeming or sympathetic features the character has, the character's Freudian Excuse if they have one, as well as any other potential mitigating factors like Offscreen Villainy or questions of moral agency. Try to present these as objectively as possible by presenting any evidence that may support or refute the mitigating factors.
Do they meet the Heinousness Standard?
Here you compare the actions of the Candidate to other character actions in the story in order to determine if they stand out or not. Remember that all characters, not just other villains, contribute to the Heinousness Standard
Final Verdict?
Simply state whether or not you think the character counts or not.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 31st 2023 at 4:14:10 AM
Anyway, for the One Piece monster page, I propose we use this image of Kuro◊ and cut the bottom panel.
For the Jo Jo monster page, we could use a quote about Cioccolata since apparently we're going to put a Dio image and I don't think we should have a quote and image both of the same monster.
- I don't know how many people he's killed, but whenever he watches them die, he feels unimaginable bliss
edited 26th Sep '16 12:13:05 PM by Awesomekid42
@The Fox About Tenpenny, he is a prime example of a character that would be a CM in any work OTHER than Grand Theft Auto. Though he and his unit are rotten to the core and terrorize, murder and blackmail other gangs similar to a gang themselves, GTA is full of similar back-stabbing, selfish and over-the-top sadistic assholes void of any redeeming qualities and in-universe they are pretty much the equivalent of "normal" people considering the overall tone of the entire series.
edited 26th Sep '16 12:17:15 PM by Kookosbanaani
Fun fact: Rodrigo is played by Carlos Bernard, who played Tony Almeida on 24. The next one I'm bringing up named Finch was played by DB Woodside, who was Wayne Palmer on 24.
I'm now tentative on Jorges. Gui reminds me a bit of Frollo, though not nearly as nasty.
In addition to Damon Killian from The Running Man, were Chip Hazard from Small Soldiers and Frank Costello from The Departed ever discussed?
edited 26th Sep '16 1:38:13 PM by futuremoviewriter
Frank was, but not fully in depth.
Welcome to the world of greatest media!Don't know about Costello, but I don't think Chip counts:
- Even Evil Has Standards: He's only programmed to destroy the Gorgonites, neither he or his squad attack any humans with lethal intent unless they are allied with said Gorgonites. When Alan first confronts him, he orders a retreat rather than directly attacking him despite the advantage in numbers. The exception being Nick Nitro, who stayed behind to try and stop Alan from freeing Archer.
- A Father to His Men: A rare villainous example. He does care for his troops, vowing to leave no man behind and later showing sadness at Nick Nitro's death.
- Punch-Clock Villain: He's just following his programming rather than being genuinely malicious. For the record, he thinks he's a hero. But let's be abundantly clear: MAJOR HAZARD IS NO HERO!
Once again. Search function. Use it.
Anyways, no, Chip Hazard in particular doesn't count in any way or form... programming and motivation issues aside, his reaction to Nick Nitro's death disqualifies him on the spot.
edited 26th Sep '16 2:07:55 PM by Scraggle
Costello doesn't go beyond standard mob boss villainy.
Damon Killian might be worth look at, though, but it's been a while since I saw The Running Man.
Bernardo and Jorge.
edited 26th Sep '16 2:07:56 PM by DemonDuckofDoom
I'll just abstain on these characters
So, are we going to have effort posts for Fang and M. Bison?
Man if I had played Street Fighter, I would have made the effort posts
edited 26th Sep '16 2:52:09 PM by G-Editor
If someone has sufficient knowledge of the series/characters and is willing to formally propose them? I don't see why not.
Bernando, and Jorge is even less heinous so no to him as well.
Damon Killian might actually count.
Killian might also be a Punch-Clock Villain, but we'll see what we'll see. He acts considerate towards the audience, but he's clearly playing to them to invest in the show and may not give a damn in reality. He's likely to turn on anyone at any point for convenience. When he's discussed more fully, I think there'll be a clear picture.
As awful as Costello is, yeah, he doesn't go beyond regular unsympathetic mobsters in movies and he also has a bit of a Pet the Dog moment in that he trusted Billy and left him all his recordings, including his conversations with Colin.
One could argue that Chip is still bloodthirsty and that any emotion he had towards Nick Nitro is subverted when he uses his chip to turn the Gwendy dolls into soldiers themselves. Then again, yeah it's all in his programming and he doesn't exactly have a choice. So yeah, he doesn't count.
edited 26th Sep '16 2:38:10 PM by futuremoviewriter
What happened to the discussion on the Teikun/Huang body double? There were four (Snakeky-man, username2527, Demon Duckof Doom, and myself), and one (Awesomekid 42).
jjjfor the body double
If I get to it, I hope to have 2 effortposts Saturday (Adam Grafton's SVU ep, and Bad Willy from the latest Scarecrow book).
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsAlso, what was the decision on Gabriel?
Why so serious?Gabriel was voted a keeper. Someone still needs to craft his writeup as the OP hasn't posted here since they put the effortpost.
I've got sort of an odd proposal myself... this is from a Danish animated movie called Fuglekrigen i Kanøfleskoven - or War of the Birds, in English, from way back in my childhood. I remembered its villain out the blue the other day and I figure he might be worth a gander. The film itself is in Danish, and unsubbed copies of it are everywhere online, but a watch-through of the movie with some butchered subtitles and a plethora of research on the side make me comfortable enough to do an effortpost. Here's Fagin, the Big Bad of the movie.
Who is Fagin? What has he done?
Fagin is a sinister black vulture responsible for essentially all the misery that goes around in this film. He's a murderous thrill-killer who essentially holds control of the local woods, spreading, by the movie's own word, "terror and death" as he pleases and generally terrorizing all the animals within. Fagin's feared and dreaded by the animals of both the forest and the neighboring city for his random attack. Fagin opens up the movie doing just what he's known for, attacking the nest of two sparrows - the parents of protagonist Oliver - and killing both of them. Fagin simultaneously wipes out the nest and destroys all but one of the seven unborn eggs before flying off. This isn't an isolated occurrence, as Fagin - among many other implied kills - previously murdered the parents of fellow protagonist Olivia and the mother of two local mice Frederick and Ingolf. Case in point, Fagin's probably the most prolific murderer of parents since Disney. The surviving egg hatches into Oliver, who's taken into the care of a bluebird named Betty and an owl named Walter.
Olivia, Oliver, Frederick and Ingolf eventually come together. All four of them have a rightful grudge against Fagin and swear to eventually rid the woods of him. Fagin's next approach is signaled by a nameless white dove - who she is, I'll get to below - who swoops down from the skies one otherwise playful day to try and kill Olivia and Oliver. Olivia and Oliver flee to the safety of a can; Fagin mockingly calls them "adorable" before simply trying to crush them to death within the can itself. Thankfully, Fagin's scared off by the timely arrival of a man and his curious dog. Now, as for who the Dove is... the Dove, shrouded in rumor around the woods, is actually Fagin's slave. Fagin's incredibly abusive to her, slicing a deep, bloody gash in her chest during one of the scenes they share together for a chuckle. Fagin's abuse has shaped the Dove into a nervous, stuttering wreck.
Word begins to spread around the city and the woods about Oliver's growing effort to stop Fagin, culminating in Oliver and his friends setting a trap for him. Fagin's quick to stumble across the trap and confronts Oliver. Oliver angrily confronts Fagin on his parents. Fagin cruelly dismisses the matter and tries to kill his friends. Fagin knocks Oliver out in his attempt to save them, and Fagin moves in for the kill. Before he can, however, Betty arrives just in time to gorily tear out Fagin's eye. Enraged and half-blind, Fagin pursues Betty up to the clouds, away from everyone else, and kills her.
Though tragedy strikes the woods, Oliver's effort to stop Fagin is only reinforced. Winter comes, life continues, and eventually, the confrontation comes to a head. Fagin returns to avenge his eye in a snow-covered clearing and once again tries to kill Oliver and his friends. Fagin chases Oliver through the skies whilst his friends set a massive fire to a stack of hay below them. Oliver tries in vain to draw Fagin into the flame, and before any real progress can be made, Fagin spitefully swipes up Olivia instead and tries to fly off with her, cackling. Oliver flies after him, frees Olivia, and ends up captured by a furious Fagin himself. By this point, however, the Dove - who's been observing everything up to this point - finally stands up for herself and turns on Fagin, forcefully tugging him out of the air and into the fire. Fagin begins to tear into the Dove, but the fire catches onto his wing and sets him ablaze, sending both the Dove and a screaming Fagin to their fiery demise.
Any mitigating factors?
Yes, the tone of the film is rather light-hearted and even incredibly crude at times (I blame Danish Values Dissonance). Fagin is not. The comedy dies whenever he enters the scene and every moment of his onscreen is him either trying to kill children or killing other characters. He's not just a natural predator, either, as he's quickly established as a murderous sadist who kills other animals mainly for the fun of it. So, all in all, not much to talk about here.
Conclusion?
He's a keeper, I'd wager.
Thoughts?
edited 25th Feb '17 12:19:18 AM by Scraggle
Last I checked, most everyone voted on him, but the user who effortposted him disappeared and never did the writeup.
edited 26th Sep '16 4:21:24 PM by Tyk5919
I write stories and shiz. You can read them here.Fagin
Welcome to the world of greatest media!Fagin
So if the user isn't going to do the write up who is?
edited 26th Sep '16 4:28:13 PM by G-Editor
Fagin (Fagin and Oliver? CAN'T be a coincidence).
Someone PM the troper who did the effortpost. That usually works.
edited 26th Sep '16 4:29:55 PM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsI'm going to say yes to Fagin.
Also, when is Major Taussig's entry being added to the main page? I touched up his entry a bit on the YMMV page.
edited 26th Sep '16 4:30:51 PM by Clown-Face
Why so serious? Taussig's been at Film F To O since, like, the beginning.
I just requested adding the re-touched-up entry.
edited 26th Sep '16 4:38:01 PM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsFagin BTW. Another one of those films, eh?
edited 26th Sep '16 4:39:50 PM by Tyk5919
I write stories and shiz. You can read them here.
No on Benardo as well. Neither characters hit the CM mark for me.
@ACW: To each their own then.