Follow TV Tropes

Following

Real Life section maintenance (New Crowner 19 Feb 2024)

Go To

Note: If a newly launched trope was already given a No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only designation while it was being drafted on the Trope Launch Pad, additions to the proper index do not need to go through this thread. Instead, simply ask the mods to add the trope via this thread.

This is the thread to report tropes with problematic Real Life sections.

Common problems include:

Real Life sections on the wiki are kept as long as they don't become a problem. If you find an article with such problems, report it here. Please note that the purpose of this thread is to clean up and maintain real life sections, not raze them. Cutting should be treated as a last resort, so please only suggest cutting RL sections or a subset thereof you think the examples in question are completely unsalvageable.

If historical RL examples are not causing any problems, consider whether it would be better to propose a No Recent Examples, Please! (via this forum thread) for RL instead of NRLEP. If RL examples are causing problems only for certain subjects, consider whether a Limited Real Life Examples Only restriction would be preferable to NRLEP.

If you think a trope should be No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only, then this thread is the place to discuss it. However, please check Keep Real Life Examples first to see if it has already been brought up in the past. If not, state the reasons and add it to the crowner.

Before adding to the crowner:

  • The trope should be proposed in the thread, along with reasons for why a crowner is necessary instead of a cleanup.
  • There must be support from others in thread.
  • Any objections should be addressed.
  • Allow a minimum of 24 hours for discussion.

When adding to the crowner:

  • Be sure to add the trope name, a link to where the discussion started, the reasons for crownering, whether the restriction being proposed is NRLEP or LRLEO (and in the latter case, which subject(s) the restriction would be for), and the date added.
  • Announce in thread that you are adding the item.
  • An ATT advert should be made as well (batch items together if more than one trope goes up in a day).

In order for a crowner to pass:

  • Must have been up for a minimum of a week
  • There must be a 2:1 ratio
  • If the vote is exactly 2:1 or +/- 1 vote from that, give it a couple extra days to see if any more votes come in
  • Once passed, tropes must be indexed on the appropriate NRLEP index
  • Should the vote fail, the trope should be indexed on KRLE page

Sex Tropes, Rape and Sexual Harassment Tropes, and Morality Tropes are banned from having RL sections so tropes under those indexes don't need crowner vote.

Crowner entries that have already been called will have "(CLOSED)" appended to them — and are no longer open for discussion.

After bringing up a trope for discussion, please wait at least a day for feedback before adding it to the crowner.

NRLEP tag:

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/NoRealLifeExamplesPlease via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: [crowner link]
%%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

LRLEO tag:

%% Trope was declared Administrivia/LimitedRealLifeExamplesOnly via crowner by the Real Life Maintenance thread: [crowner link]
%%The following restrictions apply: [list restriction(s) here]
%%https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13350380440A15238800

Notes:
  • This thread is not for general discussion regarding policies for Real Life sections or crowners. Please take those conversations to this Wiki Talk thread.
  • Do not try to overturn previous No Real Life Examples, Please! or Limited Real Life Examples Only decisions without a convincing argument.
  • As mentioned here, the consensus is that NRLEP warnings in trope page descriptions can use bold text so that they stand out.
  • The [[noreallife]] tag doesn't currently work. This is a deprecated tag that was introduced many years ago — originally, it would have displayed a NRLEP warning banner when you edited the page. However, there's been some staff conversation (Feb 2024) about what a new technical solution might look like, so we'd advise against deleting these from pages, at least until we have a decision as to whether it'll be fixed or replaced.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Mar 8th 2024 at 10:49:13 AM

Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#5751: Sep 30th 2016 at 2:49:03 AM

Re: Supervillain Lair: the trope is not "bad guy who happens to live in super-fancy digs". It's about a lair that is, shall we say, somewhat villainous itself. There's a long list of features such lairs tend to sport, and the RL examples display few or none of these features. (Many of them because nobody in RL would ever build such features into an actual residence!)

There's a couple that are borderline, but most, I think are simply bad examples.

And, of course, it's calling real people villains.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
GnomeTitan Oversized Garden Ornament Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Oversized Garden Ornament
#5752: Sep 30th 2016 at 5:25:11 AM

[up]To be picky, the fact that the real-life examples are shoehorned is not reason enough to make the trope NRLEP.

But calling real people villains is, and that's the reason stated in the crowner, so the argument is moot, really.

edited 30th Sep '16 5:25:30 AM by GnomeTitan

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#5753: Sep 30th 2016 at 7:28:08 AM

The exact definition doesn't really matter, as long as it includes someone or something being villainous. That's applying morality to it, which we don't do.

edited 30th Sep '16 7:28:54 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
GnomeTitan Oversized Garden Ornament Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Oversized Garden Ornament
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
MagBas Mag Bas from In my house Since: Jun, 2009
#5756: Oct 3rd 2016 at 2:11:18 PM

half of the examples in the real life section in Free-Range Children were removed recently because of their status as generic examples. And, if i am remembering well, the folder in question was a generic example magnet in the past.

Opinions?

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#5757: Oct 4th 2016 at 5:44:16 PM

The two examples currently in there are viable, so maybe a note asking not to put generic examples can do?

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#5758: Oct 4th 2016 at 10:41:30 PM

I removed two examples. Saying "half", while technically correct, kind of makes it sound like there were a lot of examples removed.

Check out my fanfiction!
PegasusKnightmare Since: Aug, 2016
#5759: Oct 6th 2016 at 2:36:36 PM

Likes Older Women has a Real Life section and probably shouldn't. It's a just a list of celebrities who dated/married/slept with older women as well as a few generic "examples" on the popularity of MILF porn. Some of the age differences aren't even noteworthy, like "This actor is five years younger than his wife."

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#5761: Oct 6th 2016 at 4:47:09 PM

Definitely warrants a run through the crowner.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
PegasusKnightmare Since: Aug, 2016
#5762: Oct 7th 2016 at 11:20:02 AM

[up][up] Gossip, yes, as well as being a dating/shipping trope.

DoctorCooper Since: Dec, 2014 Relationship Status: Don't hug me; I'm scared
MagBas Mag Bas from In my house Since: Jun, 2009
#5764: Oct 20th 2016 at 12:45:31 PM

A thing i noted: Hypocrite is No Real Life Examples Please but Hypocritical Fandom is not.

edited 20th Oct '16 12:45:54 PM by MagBas

Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#5765: Oct 20th 2016 at 12:47:30 PM

I honestly think Hypocritical Fandom should just die in a fire. It's just asking for trouble, plus it's ignoring how different facets of fandoms can have differing opinions that are only visible when said fans as loud enough.

edited 20th Oct '16 12:49:05 PM by Karxrida

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Irene Since: Aug, 2012
#5766: Oct 20th 2016 at 4:32:34 PM

We really don't need a trope like that about a fandom anyway. It would only be useful as In-Universe(and unless the trope shows up really often, well...), because otherwise it's just complaining about other people.

Candi Sorcerer in training from Closer to rimward than hubward Since: Aug, 2012 Relationship Status: They can't hide forever. We've got satellites.
Sorcerer in training
#5767: Oct 20th 2016 at 8:24:48 PM

That would be another thread, though. All we can do here is shut down the RL section.

Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett
DoctorCooper Since: Dec, 2014 Relationship Status: Don't hug me; I'm scared
#5768: Oct 25th 2016 at 8:45:47 PM

It is an index, so it is not useful to list it there.

TheKaizerreich An Ice Girl Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
An Ice Girl
#5769: Oct 31st 2016 at 10:19:52 AM

I suggest that Invading Refugees gets labeled as "historical examples only" (I've seen this on a few trope pages), because this page will attract Edit Warring and political bickering alá Too Soon and I also think that the current statement about the Refugee Crisis is a massive oversimplification, but going into detail about it would be a treatise in itself, so IMHO it would be better to just disallow it.

Wuz Since: Jun, 2013
#5770: Nov 2nd 2016 at 10:57:07 PM

The real life section of Meaningful Name is quite problematic. Not to the point where it requires outright deletion (meaningful names do exist in real life), but reading it just feels wrong.

The page almost exclusively deals with "Aptronyms", names that are "aptly or peculiarly suited to its owner".

The problem is, these are not Meaningful Names.

Aptronyms are like coincidences, things that could happen but is not engineered. Nominative determinism hypothesizes that some aspect of these names do lead to people having lives that "live up to them" later in their lives, but is still a hypothesis. Worse still, we started making up convoluted connections between the name and the life that feel more and more contrived as we go on, to the point where nominative determinism couldn't justify it anymore.

Let me give you an example from the page to demonstrate:

  • Roger Tory Peterson is best known for his popular field guides to birds. Tori is the Japanese word for bird.

In this example (of which I consider is one of the most contrived examples on the page), bird guide author "Tory"'s name is linked to his profession via the Japanese word Tori. Nevermind that Mr. Peterson is not from a Japanese family and that the name "Tory"'s actual meanings (as found after a quick search) are "From the knolls/Lives by the tower/derived from Irish tóraidhe which means outlaw", all of which has nothing to do with birds.

The example has nothing to do with the actual meaning of the name. It's a lucky aptronym (a contrived one still), and nothing more. Examples like this are better as examples of Stephen Ulysses Perhero or Prophetic Names (though for which one I am not sure as the distinction between the two is incredibly vague and is worth a clean-up of its own)

A meaningful name is about the name's "meaning". Be it brutally direct or delicately hidden, the name's meaning is bestowed on birth. In fiction characters are named at creation instead of at birth, but for real life the meanings of the names are assigned at birth and is not designed to be appropriated to a later life event.

And names can and do have meanings in real life. Many Eastern Asian names (esp. Chinese and Japanese) are indeed named with significance. I myself (a Chinese citizen at birth) has a personal name engineered in a way to be an oblique homophonic reference to "With Fortune".

And it's not just that, I've seen names that reference classic poetry, siblings names that reference rain and snow, real-life Name That Unfolds Like Lotus Blossom. (For some reference, the name descriptions for characters in Thunderbolt Fantasy would give you a rough idea of how the East Asian languages associate meanings to individual characters and create entire meanings to names by stringing the characters together)

Names in western countries also have their meanings. Surnames derived from ancient lineages, given names with meanings of their own, and Germanic surnames that include entire stories in a single word. These are examples that would fit the title Meaningful Name better, rather than coincidental aptronyms. Unfortunately, I had yet to find a single example about things like these on the page. All examples I have read yet are aptronyms.

edited 2nd Nov '16 11:17:45 PM by Wuz

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#5771: Nov 3rd 2016 at 1:09:11 PM

Yeah, that page needs a lot of scrubbing. I think the basic requirement is (or should be) that the name comes after what it references. If the name comes first, it's a coincidence. Even if it's a name the parents hope will fulfill itself, it's still not a meaningful name, since it's not given to a person who has that trait at that time. Unless the name actually is "Hope", since that's what the person symbolises at the time.

Some old surnames are almost more plainly descriptive than meaningful, but would probably fit (which is the origin of names like Smith and Potter).

Real people can still have taken names that are meant to be meaningful, especially stage names and pen names.

Check out my fanfiction!
GnomeTitan Oversized Garden Ornament Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Oversized Garden Ornament
#5772: Nov 3rd 2016 at 1:26:43 PM

I agree. In general, a name given before the fact can (as far as we know) only be meaningful in a work of fiction. I can think of exceptions, though: suppose somebody is really determined to do something, and to motivate himself takes a name with a meaning related to that ambition.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#5773: Nov 3rd 2016 at 8:42:03 PM

I would say if someone takes a name in that way, it's a vocalisation of that person's own ambition, so it is symbolic in that way, at the time the name is taken, even if it's not fully realised. I wouldn't accept the same reasoning for someone who was given the name by someone who isn't fully aware of the named person's ambition, which is always the case when naming babies.

Check out my fanfiction!
GnomeTitan Oversized Garden Ornament Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Oversized Garden Ornament
#5774: Nov 4th 2016 at 12:10:13 AM

Agreed.

edited 4th Nov '16 2:11:37 AM by GnomeTitan

Wuz Since: Jun, 2013
#5775: Nov 4th 2016 at 5:01:25 AM

Good ideas. I agree with everything we've discussed so far.

edited 4th Nov '16 5:03:48 AM by Wuz

18th Feb '24 11:27:30 PM

Crown Description:

Vote up to either forbid all real life examples (No Real Life Examples Please) or forbid real life examples for specific subjects (Limited Real Life Examples Only); vote down to Keep Real Life Examples. To add a trope to a No Real Life Examples Please index or the Limited Real Life Examples Only index, its crowner option must meet the following criteria:
  • Stable 2:1 ratio needed for NRLEP or LRLEO
  • Must have been up for a minimum of a week
  • If the vote is exactly 2:1 or +/- 1 vote from that, give it a couple of extra days to see if more votes come in.

After you bring up a trope for discussion, please try to wait at least a day or so for feedback before adding it to the crowner.

If an item has a (CLOSED) note, there is no need to vote on it: the result has already been decided and it's no longer up for discussion.

Total posts: 15,952
Top