The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
The cut decisions have been implemented.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanArmour-plated liver is no problem. Time, on the other hand...
Check out my fanfiction!Is a majority two out of three?
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.3 out of 5 right now.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAnd with only three active P5 members, that means votes must be unanimous within the quorum.
edited 9th Jul '15 12:54:39 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"For the purposes of moving stuff along, here's the things with two votes currently:
- Rules Universe - two angels (Note that the page flagged by the tool isn't actually the correct work page.)
- Hybrid Child - two angels
- This Boy Belongs To Us - two devils
- Wet Goddess - two angels
The third vote will decide keep/cut, or if it just gets tabled until we get more people.
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)There probably should be another P5 member, but since their workload is low and the votes haven't been split in a long time it's not really a pressing concern.
Yeah. If there's a split decision, the mods'll hear about it and a new Chosen One will join the P5's ranks.
And if the split is 2-2 after that, then it's a real emergency, and the mods will quickly pick another forum kibitzer to settle it before the existing members die of liver failure.
Okay, I've finally caught up, giving angelheads and devilheads as I saw fit. Again, I would like to apologize for my recent lack of presence here lately—college work and other offsite obligations have been taking priority.
Also, I would just like to say that, with all the yaoi works I've had to read from the queue, I'm officially burned out on the thing.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Yaoi: Reason #2 I wouldn't want to be part of the P5.
Is Reason 1 paedophilia, guro, or scat?
What's precedent ever done for us?@Komodin: At least it wasn't Sonic x Shadow.
I'd think paedophilia would be #1 on anyone's list of reasons they'd hate to review sketchy works.
Cracked ran an article a bit back interviewing a student who, as an undergraduate, infiltrated the Darknet side of the web to find out how pedophiles think and act when they believe no one's watching.
Warning: If you go search that article, your faith in humanity will die. Or at least hit ICU. I was severely nauseous, which is a rare reaction to anything I read.
So yeah, anything pedophilia would be #1 on the 'urk' list, and explains why P5 keep a well-stocked liquor cabinet.
Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry PratchettWell now you just HAD to me me curious
That is definitely one of the most disturbing things I've read in a long time.
I was mostly joking about how with the long list of ghastly shit that gets thrown in the P5's direction, hyper-stylised gay porn would probably be well down the awful rankings.
What's precedent ever done for us?I tried looking up this Cracked article. Is it titled "5 Things I Learned Infiltrating Deep Web Child Molesters" and written by Robert Evans in June this very year?
edited 10th Jul '15 1:10:45 PM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.That's the one I found, yes.
Note, before we get any wiseacres: We're not gonna cut Cracked just because of that article. It involves pedopanderEEs, not pedopandering.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.There must be a default, to keep or to kill. If an article is flagged, does it take three (unanimous) devils to change it from the default angel, or three (unanimous) angels to change it from the default devil?
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Wow, that is creepy shit. I mean, the article itself does mention that there are pedophiles out there who would be genuinely appalled that people would think they would actually hurt children by indulging their desires (they probably restrict themselves to drawn/animated lolicon porn, like most people with fetishes that can't/shouldn't be applied in reality for one reason or the other), but that "two camps" thing later on is utterly mind-boggling in its self-deluding hypocrisy.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.The devils doom a work. Until there are three of them, the page stays.
I've also encountered (do not ask where) several people that swear by "What, you thought '2d girls are better' was a joke?"
As in, only interested in drawn lolis, not real children.
Okay, stopping. Sorry.
edited 10th Jul '15 7:13:26 PM by Adannor
I'm pretty sure this line of discussion is on the highway to the danger zone, so I'd say take it to PMs.
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
Besides, not everyone has the armor-plated liver required.
Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett