Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1151: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:47:02 PM

I have concerns about that being too busy and the trope kind of hidden.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1152: Jun 26th 2015 at 6:24:18 AM

Well, the point was to try to come up with something that approached the trope in a lighthearted fashion and that was the first example that came to mind from my knowledge base...the three-cover pics are because this particular gag ran for a long time in-story spread out over those three issues.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1153: Jun 26th 2015 at 6:33:08 AM

Remind me of something: That page is imageless because of advertiser complaints, or for another reason? I am inclined to say that the former case would require more care. Also, worth noting that the trope is subpaged, images from specific mediums can go on the subpages.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1154: Jun 26th 2015 at 7:22:45 AM

I believe it was because people kept replacing pics with more extreme or racier pics, but I could be wrong. Trying to put pics on the subpages for it could be problematic, as I think it could bring either the replacement issue or people making troll Google reports on us for some media...that's another reason why I was going for the Cerebus pics, they're about as unoffensive a depiction as I could think of.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#1155: Jun 27th 2015 at 6:35:08 AM

Sorry I've been so absent so long, ongoing computer issues.

I frankly don't see a need to make a concerted effort to replace the Admin Fiat and No Pic pages. Why not just treat them like any other page: if you can present a good reason the pic should be changed, and a valid alternative for the admin fiat pages; or present what you believe to be a good option for the No pic pages, make a thread, present your case clearly and cogently in the OP, including the suggested replacement, and we'll talk about it, on the merits of the argument and suggestion presented.

Bonus points if you find and link to any previous threads discussing the same page.

Double bonus points if you address the issues brought up in those threads right from the start.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#1156: Jun 27th 2015 at 8:33:00 AM

Sorry if this seems an out-of-the-blue change of topic, but what's the procedure to follow if I wanted to gather image examples for an Image Links subpage to give a good idea of what a trope and some of its notable variations tend to look, e.g. Fairytale Wedding Dress?

PS: The thing is, I don't really know what differentiates a Fairytale Wedding Dress from the "average" pimped-out Western-style wedding dress, and the image doesn't really do a good job of clarifying it for me. I'd make a Do Not Illustrate thread for the trope, but IINM I need to propose at least one alternative image, else it gets shut down.

edited 27th Jun '15 8:37:24 AM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1157: Jun 27th 2015 at 1:59:53 PM

"I frankly don't see a need..."

Those lists have been rigid and unquestionable. Are you saying that isn't true now?

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#1158: Jun 27th 2015 at 5:31:41 PM

I don't see a need to make it a dedicated project. And no, I don't see them as rigid and unquestionable now. They were before because Eddie owned the site,and it was his prerogative as the admin to issue an admin fiat. It was also his job to deal with the fallout from unsuitable page images (and incidentally, to bear the financial cost of the site while our ads were suspended.)

That prerogative and that responsibility lie with Drew and Co. now, and if they choose to exercise admin fiat, we will be bound to accept it. But they have not, as far as I know, made any blanket statement regarding keeping Eddie's fiats in place.

So, treat them like any other page: make a thread, with good sound reasons to change the image and at least one suggestion in the OP. Then we can talk about it.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1159: Jun 27th 2015 at 5:49:46 PM

Was it still possible to change Eddie's mind with good enough reasoning/suggestions, though? As in, what Maddy said a few posts up was still true back then. The only difference now is that it's not Eddie's mind you've got to change.

Check out my fanfiction!
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1160: Jun 27th 2015 at 6:07:08 PM

In my experience, he very rarely changed his mind. Like, no, it often wasn't possible; in many cases the issue was not up for debate, period. "It's on the 'don't' list" had been (AFAIK up until a few minutes ago) a knock-down argument. The fact that they've been 100% (or extremely close to) unquestionable is why I wanted to talk about what's on them. If that's not true, you're right, a dedicated project is unnecessary.

If the pages on the "no pic" and "don't change the pic" lists are subject to page image changes just like any other page, why have those lists at all? If some kind of message needs to be communicated to people who might make a change, an editor-only note on each article, instead, would be simpler and more effective.

Also, what about the "BUPKIS" and "multiple threads" list combination suggestion?

edited 28th Jun '15 1:26:39 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1161: Jun 27th 2015 at 8:00:31 PM

[up] I still think we need to keep the BUPKIS and "multiple threads" lists separate, mainly because the former is for pages that we haven't necessarily had a lot of discussion but have been set to "don't put up a pic w/o an IP thread" whereas the latter is for pages that often enough do have a pic and that have had a lot of discussion that hasn't gone anywhere.

[up][up] The guidelines were always set up to give the option to discuss options for everything on the lists, but they had to be approved by the staff first and if Eddie got in on the discussion, that wasn't likely to happen.

edited 27th Jun '15 8:04:51 PM by Willbyr

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1162: Jun 30th 2015 at 10:44:21 AM

I would like to move on but feel like this is unresolved.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1163: Jun 30th 2015 at 10:54:26 AM

Before we can move on any of these, I think we need to get a consensus on which pages should be left in their current state. Does anyone else have thoughts on the "no pic" list, especially my take on it?

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1164: Jun 30th 2015 at 11:07:12 AM

I think a more important question is whether those lists should exist at all.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#1165: Jun 30th 2015 at 11:13:33 AM

I say any page should be up for IP to decide on a good image.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1166: Jul 1st 2015 at 1:11:19 AM

I think it's useful to have a list for pages we've for various reason decided to have no image on, since it allows people to see if it's a page we've just missed adding an image to, or if there's a reason it doesn't have one. These pages would probably need a very good suggestion to begin discussing whether to put one on, and require a bit more thought to what an appropriate image would be.

Check out my fanfiction!
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1167: Jul 1st 2015 at 1:22:10 AM

If there is no implication that being on the list means it has higher requirements to change the page image—I mean, such a list would imply that, just by existing... but if it never gets used as an argument against a change—then okay, whatever, it's fine.

I feel like somewhere between "do nothing" and "dedicated project" is a reasonable course of action, a quick review. Any other comments on #1139?

edited 1st Jul '15 1:42:07 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1168: Jul 3rd 2015 at 9:21:46 AM

Well, this doesn't seem to be going anywhere, so I'm going to start making some threads.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1169: Jul 5th 2015 at 1:03:11 PM

Okay. Next: Thread approval in IP. What's up with that?

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1170: Jul 5th 2015 at 7:59:12 PM

[up] That hasn't been discussed among the staff in some time, so my call is "not going away anytime soon." That said, in general we've seen very few threads come through in the last few months that were weak enough to warrant denial. I may have been a little too lenient with some threads but overall I've been pleased with what's come through.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1171: Jul 5th 2015 at 11:25:36 PM

Okay; why is it not going away? What is good about it? What goal is trying to be accomplished?

I think there are some very bad things about it, and no good ones. Zero. Really, I don't understand (and as far as I know it has never been explained): Why?

edited 5th Jul '15 11:35:07 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
justanid Since: Jan, 2010
#1172: Jul 6th 2015 at 2:45:14 PM

Has it even helped having it in TRS? I'm seeing multiple unopened conversations there from last December.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1173: Jul 6th 2015 at 4:02:46 PM

It may...I repeat, may...go away when the major site redesign happens, but I'm not promising anything. Drew and co. have had a lot on their plates lately and this issue, if it's even on their to-do list, is way down in priority.

edited 6th Jul '15 4:04:24 PM by Willbyr

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1174: Jul 6th 2015 at 6:27:59 PM

Okay but why? I'd rather the system for TRS was not part of this discussion, because there is at least an explanation (whether you agree or not) for why it's there. For IP, though, it's not like I understand and disagree, I actually don't understand.

It could "go away" without any tech change, so drewski and ictdr's availability is not a factor.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1175: Jul 7th 2015 at 7:59:43 PM

The whole point behind that change was an ongoing glut of just plain bad IP threads, usually for extremely flimsy reasons or trying to suggest something that was in no way better than was already on the page. The logic, as I recall, was "if we can't get people to do their homework, we'll make them" along the same lines as the TRS thread approval. Overall I think it's been a success, as I've had to deny very few threads in the last few months. Of course, we've had a great many threads about blank pages and I tend to auto-open those, but the threads that have suggested changes have, for the most part, been solid and generated productive discussion, even if we vote to leave the page as is.

As for whether to keep it...I can take or leave it. IP is usually the last forum I check when I'm going through that side, and when I'm going through Hollers I check the requested threads as soon as I come across them so I can mark those hollers as done. If there's one I'm wavering on, I'll ask for other input either in the hollers list or on our off-site chat. The other mods no doubt have their opinions and I won't speak for them.

Side note - I spend a lot of my down time at work catching up stuff on the wiki, and a lot of the image sites like Photobucket or Imgur are blocked, so when I just open a thread without commenting on the suggestion(s) or ask for someone to put up a crowner winner, it's because I actually can't look at the pic to do the legwork on my own.

edited 7th Jul '15 8:00:26 PM by Willbyr


Total posts: 9,737
Top