Follow TV Tropes

Following

Clarifying the definition: This Is For Emphasis Bitch

Go To

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#26: Nov 8th 2011 at 9:01:14 AM

The precision is irrelevant here. It's not about that. It's about "bitch" being a verbal exclamation point.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#27: Nov 8th 2011 at 9:49:13 AM

It does, actually, Bitch. It means that the Precision F-Strike only applies in certain cases, and those do not always overlap with this trope's examples, Bitch. If the precision refers to moral guardians, then R-rated works do not overlap, Bitch. The trope comes from the Juggernaut;s one line, Bitch. I see it as mostly Gratuitous Cussing, albeit a specific form, Bitch. Even in this example, I'm doing mostly to prove the lack of Precision, Bitch. And I'm still not sure if it is separate from the Cluster F-Bomb, Bitch.

Besides, is this really limited to the one word, Fucker?

(Oh, and where's the swear jar? I need to drop my wallet off)

edited 8th Nov '11 9:49:27 AM by crazysamaritan

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#28: Nov 8th 2011 at 12:47:51 PM

No, because as you are showing, these can be used a lot at once, which makes more a spread out cluster F bomb than just a precision strike.

And a post is not an article, so that pothole you made of Self-Demonstrating Article is a misuse.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#29: Nov 8th 2011 at 1:46:10 PM

Right... I thought we were still addressing post #17... That's why I was discussing precision f strike in the first place. Since you said the precision was not relevant, I gave up discussing it obliquely, and tried to make it as obvious as possible that the lack of precision in this trope could make it fall outside of Precision F-Strike territory.

What should I have potholed it to?

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#30: Nov 8th 2011 at 2:20:55 PM

Why should it have been potholed at all?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#31: Nov 8th 2011 at 2:58:24 PM

To make it clear that I wasn't personally addressing you, but demonstrating my point with an example, while I was also explaining my point. So, the same purpose of the Self Demonstrating Articles.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#32: Nov 8th 2011 at 3:30:40 PM

Tropes are not points alone. A self demonstrating article is trope descriptions, not just a single word, in the description or elsewhere. Sorry if that's a bit pedantic, but it's so misused now.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#33: Nov 8th 2011 at 3:39:59 PM

But the use of This Is for Emphasis, Bitch! is a single word. My point was the use of the trope outside of a precision f strike, so I wrote a post using it.

Don't apologize; I'm learning.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#34: Nov 8th 2011 at 3:54:46 PM

Okay, then. My point is a self demonstrating article cannot be. They are mutually exclusive.

As for this trope, another reason it's limited to "bitch" is that, as mentioned in the description, it's become a spoof of what it used to be, so it's now emphasis+Rule of Funny.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Insignificant Since: Dec, 1969
#35: Nov 8th 2011 at 4:00:23 PM

Discussion derailment, much? Let's drop the whole SDA potholing nonsense and actually discuss the topic at hand.

edited 8th Nov '11 4:04:29 PM by Insignificant

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#36: Nov 8th 2011 at 4:15:26 PM

[up][up] and the rule of funny is what moved this trope into discredited status, right?

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#37: Nov 8th 2011 at 4:36:01 PM

[up][up]We're already doing that.

[up]Pretty much that. It's not a dead horse trope yet, but it's played for laughs likely more often than straight.

edited 8th Nov '11 4:36:39 PM by DragonQuestZ

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
SeanMurrayI Since: Jan, 2010
#38: Dec 15th 2011 at 12:07:52 PM

I'm becoming more inclined to think that this page could be completely summarized as People Calling Other People 'Bitch'.

Can't we at least expand this to cover instances of characters using the word "asshole" for "emphasis", too? I can think of, at least, two Arnold Schwarzenegger films providing examples; in fact, any time Arnie ends a sentence with a cuss, it carries this trope's exact spirit. Would we need to make a new supertrope for examples with all other foul-mouthed terms for people tack on the end of sentences for Rated-R "emphasis" (douchebag, fuckwad, fucker, mother fucker, shithead, cunt, etc.)?

edited 10th Feb '12 6:49:01 PM by SeanMurrayI

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#39: Feb 16th 2012 at 6:05:13 AM

I would rather expand the trope, and note that this is an undead horse trope, rather than a discredited trope.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#40: Feb 16th 2012 at 10:17:04 AM

I would say it's a Dead Horse Trope, since straight uses are almost unheard of.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#41: Feb 16th 2012 at 10:20:06 AM

Yippie-ki-ay, motherfucker.

As it stands, not an example. Also not played for laughs.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#42: Feb 16th 2012 at 11:33:18 AM

[up]And is covered in Quote Swear Unquote anyway.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#43: Feb 16th 2012 at 1:29:14 PM

you know the image for that trope is this one,right ?

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Blissey1 insert title here from a random Pokècenter Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: I know
insert title here
#44: Feb 16th 2012 at 1:45:29 PM

hmm...is it just me, or is Quote Swear Unquote a subtrope of This Is for Emphasis, Bitch!? I mean, it's just This Is for Emphasis, Bitch! applied to a catchphrase/slogan, right?

edited 16th Feb '12 1:46:50 PM by Blissey1

XP granted for befriending a giant magical spider!
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#45: Feb 16th 2012 at 1:45:53 PM

[up]It said they can overlap. But the picture overlaps, not the Die Hard line.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
SeanMurrayI Since: Jan, 2010
#46: Feb 16th 2012 at 3:36:53 PM

...not the Die Hard line.

The original context of the line in Die Hard was for McClane to speak like a cowboy (in response to the question from Hans Gruber, "Do you really think you have a chance against us, Mr. Cowboy?"), hence adding "mother fucker" after the phrase "yippie-ki-yay".

Either way, I still see little reason why This Is for Emphasis, Bitch! should be limited to one swear. What's the fundamental difference between calling someone a "bitch" or "fucker" or "mother fucker" or anything else, anyway? Ending a sentence by calling someone a 'bitch' doesn't seem very meaningful on its own, anyway.

edited 16th Feb '12 3:41:05 PM by SeanMurrayI

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#47: Feb 16th 2012 at 4:13:58 PM

Okay, Eddie a while ago saw major Trope Decay, where any time a swear word ended a sentence, someone would claim it was an example.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
SeanMurrayI Since: Jan, 2010
#48: Feb 16th 2012 at 4:44:59 PM

That doesn't explain why "bitch" should be an exception to that. Again, what makes ending a sentence with "bitch" a trope while ending with any other type of foul-mouthed insult isn't?

Fundamentally, they're all the same.

edited 16th Feb '12 4:46:50 PM by SeanMurrayI

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#49: Feb 16th 2012 at 4:56:34 PM

The point, especially the Played for Laughs form, is to treat "bitch" as a verbal exclamation point. Simply calling someone a bitch, or an asshole, or other such word, does not apply. Now we might have gotten to some kind of agreement before, but the problem arose before TRS, if I recall correctly.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#50: Feb 17th 2012 at 7:01:05 AM

I believe that this trope was launched back while Dave Chappelle's (?) meme "Sentence. Bitch!" was thriving. I do recall that there was much heated discussion at the time about whether it should be limited only to that exact format ("Sentence. Bitch!" only); whether it should include any expletive following a complete sentence ("Not my daughter, you bitch", from Aliens); or whether it should include any expletive used for emphasis at the end of an line ("Yippee-Ki-Ay, motherfucker!").

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Add Post

Total posts: 50
Top