Follow TV Tropes

Following

The what Intimacy?: Mambo Intimacy 5

Go To

SakurazakiSetsuna Together Forever... Since: Jun, 2010
Together Forever...
#1: Mar 20th 2011 at 2:13:50 AM

So yeah. Its a videogame trope. Who knew?

Basic idea is that in a game where the Main Character can form relationships with one or more other characters and gets some sort of bonus, it is beneficial to try to have as many relationships as possible.

20 Wicks, 120 inbounds, could probably use better population, though it hits the main ones I could think of.

But the name...the name is terrible. Named for a song with no relationship to videogames, and an exceptionally obscure Tabletop RPG (notably not a Videogame).

Suggestions?

DoktorvonEurotrash Welcome, traveller, welcome to Omsk Since: Jan, 2001
Welcome, traveller, welcome to Omsk
#2: Mar 20th 2011 at 2:27:24 AM

Man does this need changing. I don't have any ideas, though.

It does not matter who I am. What matters is, who will you become? - motto of Omsk Bird
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#3: Mar 20th 2011 at 2:35:20 AM

Ok yes this could really use some a rename and maybe a little expanding for side scenes like Final Fantasy X with choices affect who is involved in the Blitz Ace move or who's monolog you get when riding to Shiva's temple.

Edit: maybe not on the expanding.

edited 20th Mar '11 2:37:26 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#5: Mar 20th 2011 at 3:08:34 AM

What is this I don't even

This is unquestionably the worst title I have ever seen still in existence (some renamed tropes were worse). Rename it.

DoktorvonEurotrash Welcome, traveller, welcome to Omsk Since: Jan, 2001
Welcome, traveller, welcome to Omsk
#6: Mar 20th 2011 at 3:47:45 AM

Ignore me.

edited 20th Mar '11 3:48:12 AM by DoktorvonEurotrash

It does not matter who I am. What matters is, who will you become? - motto of Omsk Bird
Elle Since: Jan, 2001
#7: Mar 20th 2011 at 5:42:44 PM

Yeaah....this should be Grinding Your Intimacy Skill or something. Having it go with Level-Up at Intimacy 5 still might not be bad.

MC42 Tempus Omnia Iudicat Since: Oct, 2010
Tempus Omnia Iudicat
#8: Mar 20th 2011 at 5:55:28 PM

The last sentence describes the trope as "when the game forces a Tenchi Solution" so I made "The Tenchi Solution as a gameplay mechanic" as the Laconic entry. The entire description should be re-written to expand on that instead of the nattering, whining mess it is now. Essentially, the trope is when it's advantageous, in gameplay terms, to be involved in multiple relationships instead of one committed one. Therefore, we should be deciding the answers to two questions: 1) Should the trope allow non-game entries or just put them in Tenchi Solution? 2) Should "trust" relationships count or just "intimacy" relationships? For example, should Mass Effect count since you need to gain everyone's loyalty in order to achieve the best ending but can only be involved in one intimate relationship?

"Thorough preparation must lead to success. Neglect nothing."
SakurazakiSetsuna Together Forever... Since: Jun, 2010
Together Forever...
#9: Mar 20th 2011 at 6:56:36 PM

[up]

My thoughts: Exclusively a videogame trope, unless invoked by some character, of course. But thats fairly unlikely.

Should only consider "romantic" relationships. Mass Effect would not count, since you don't get an extra bonus for romancing a character that you wouldn't get just by having their loyalty.

Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#10: Mar 20th 2011 at 8:32:01 PM

No I think it should be relationships in general.

Persona 3's Social links are also a great example of that since you complete their Dating Sim style arc you gain the most powerful persona of that Arcana but when you get them all in one run you get the ultimate persona. Only 5 or so S-links are romantic.

edited 20th Mar '11 8:32:12 PM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Elle Since: Jan, 2001
#11: Mar 20th 2011 at 8:38:47 PM

^ If that turns out to be the case, I amend my suggestion to Grinding Your Social Skill.

...on second thought, wouldn't that title also apply to reputation/favor points with factions? We have, that, right?

edited 20th Mar '11 8:39:56 PM by Elle

SakurazakiSetsuna Together Forever... Since: Jun, 2010
Together Forever...
#12: Mar 20th 2011 at 8:39:30 PM

[up]

Thats such a fantastic name I'll withdraw my position and agree with Raso.

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#13: Mar 20th 2011 at 8:39:32 PM

Yeah, there are a lot of examples of it just being relationships in general in video games. Not just romantic ones. It's actually more common with platonic relationships.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#14: Mar 20th 2011 at 9:50:04 PM

[up][up][up] We have Relationship Values but stuff like World Of Warcraft reputations are a very very borderline example of it.

edited 20th Mar '11 11:25:25 PM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
TsundereLightning Carefree Hedonist from Oakland ANIMa Corps Since: Jan, 2001
Carefree Hedonist
#17: Apr 5th 2011 at 4:31:11 PM

As the guy who created this trope, absolutley in favor of a rename.

She's sun and rain. She's fire and ice. A little crazy, but it's nice.
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#18: Apr 5th 2011 at 4:35:50 PM

Relationships Are Useful, Relationships Equal Rewards, or maybe Video Game Relationship Bonus (maybe just shortened to Relationship Bonus)?

edited 5th Apr '11 4:36:14 PM by 0dd1

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#19: May 18th 2011 at 9:42:31 PM

A month later and still no progress. This may be among the worst names on the site... why doesn't anyone seem to care?

Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#20: May 18th 2011 at 9:53:43 PM

I like the grinding ones myself. Should we start a crowner?

edited 18th May '11 9:54:13 PM by Balmung

Leaper Since: May, 2009
#21: May 18th 2011 at 10:27:02 PM

Yes, especially with the trope creator on board.

SakurazakiSetsuna Together Forever... Since: Jun, 2010
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#23: May 19th 2011 at 12:22:37 AM

Just a drive-by "let's get a crowner" post, don't mind me.

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#25: May 19th 2011 at 10:35:18 AM

I made a single proposition rename crowner here. Feel free to edit it and point out any mistakes that I may have made in the process of putting it together.

Personally, I think that Mambo Intimacy 5 should be renamed because I think it is not very indicative of what the trope is about at all.

Still, I like the part of the trope about Katamari Damacy so I hope that is kept no matter what we do with the trope.

edited 19th May '11 10:35:54 AM by LouieW

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d

AlternativeTitles: MamboIntimacy5
21st May '11 8:41:23 AM

Crown Description:

Vote up names you like, vote down names you don't. Whether or not the title will actually be changed is determined with a different kind of crowner (the Single Proposition crowner). This one just collects and ranks alternative titles.

Total posts: 55
Top