Follow TV Tropes

Following

Why is this Show Within a Show only? : Stylistic Suck

Go To

nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#1: Feb 13th 2011 at 7:31:39 PM

The title says it all. Why?

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#2: Feb 13th 2011 at 7:42:43 PM

Uh...why wouldn't it be? That's what the trope is about—shows within shows that are intentionally lower-quality than the show they're within.

Would you ask why Cool Chair doesn't apply to cool bicycles? No, because it's a trope about chairs, not bicycles. Similarly, this is a trope about shows within shows, not shows-not-within-shows.

edited 13th Feb '11 7:43:19 PM by troacctid

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#3: Feb 13th 2011 at 7:43:28 PM

Probably because people would label anything they didn't like with it.

Fight smart, not fair.
Clarste One Winged Egret Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: Non-Canon
One Winged Egret
#4: Feb 13th 2011 at 9:33:42 PM

Not sure what a non-show-within-a-show example of this would look like. The idea of expanding this doesn't make much sense.

Leaper Since: May, 2009
#5: Feb 13th 2011 at 9:41:46 PM

One possible example is Order Of The Stick, where this trope is often (mis)used to describe it.

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#6: Feb 13th 2011 at 9:42:03 PM

Currently the trope looks like it needs a lot of clean up. There's a fair bit of just "I think this sucks" from both the wiks and the examples.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Redhead Since: Jan, 2011
#7: Feb 14th 2011 at 1:05:29 AM

[1]

What OP probably meant was, why shouldn't it apply to things that were intentionally made awful?

The new It Just Bugs Me!
SpellBlade Since: Dec, 1969
#8: Feb 14th 2011 at 1:22:56 AM

That image is from an in-universe show within a show, right? We've got some serious misuse here if it isn't.

Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#9: Feb 14th 2011 at 1:31:18 AM

@OP: Probably because occurences of "stylistic suck" in the work's own setting can be excused as an Art Shift.

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#10: Feb 14th 2011 at 1:53:38 AM

When you get shows that do the extreme Art Shift like Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei Flipbook Mr Bill style Picasso Live action Claymation Cut out Pastel Silhouette Normal Animation (all in one ep btw) it does come off a little bit of this trope but its still more Art Shift.

edited 14th Feb '11 1:54:09 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Daremo Misanthrope Supreme from Parts Unknown Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: If it's you, it's okay
#11: Feb 14th 2011 at 3:08:18 AM

What about things like Grindhouse and Machete, deliberately made to feel cheesy and old? There's not a lot of room for interpretation there.

Creed of the Happy Pessimist:Always expect the worst. Then, when it happens, it was only what you expected. All else is a happy surprise.
Shale Mighty pirate! from Int'l House of Mojo Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Mighty pirate!
#12: Feb 14th 2011 at 4:02:49 AM

[up][up][up][up] Yes, it's from a character's (awful) webcomic in Homestuck.

edited 14th Feb '11 4:03:03 AM by Shale

suedenim Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl from Jet Dream HQ Since: Oct, 2009
Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl
#13: Feb 14th 2011 at 5:50:46 AM

Not sure what a non-show-within-a-show example of this would look like

There are lots of comedy examples. The Lost Skeleton Of Cadavra, for instance, is basically Stylistic Suck from start to finish.

edited 14th Feb '11 5:51:01 AM by suedenim

Jet-a-Reeno!
Shale Mighty pirate! from Int'l House of Mojo Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Mighty pirate!
#14: Feb 14th 2011 at 5:54:46 AM

Doesn't that just fall under parody, affectionate or otherwise?

suedenim Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl from Jet Dream HQ Since: Oct, 2009
Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl
#15: Feb 14th 2011 at 6:03:33 AM

It's a specific type of parody, though. In a way, it's like doing a Show Within a Show, but without the "show." Or like making a full feature out of Mant! without Matinee surrounding it.

edited 14th Feb '11 6:03:48 AM by suedenim

Jet-a-Reeno!
savage Nice Hat from an underground bunker Since: Jan, 2001
#16: Feb 14th 2011 at 8:41:41 AM

Yes, The Lost Skeleton Of Cadavra came to mind immediately as a non-show-within-a-show example. I can think of a few Art Shift examples as well, for example in the episode 'Mac Daddy' of Fosters Home For Imaginary Friends, there are several 'what if' scenarios that are animated in a very simplistic, doodle-like style, in order to highlight the child-like/bizarre nature of the character Cheese.

Related, the art style of Crayon Shin Chan is intentionally supposed to make you think of a child's drawings. Or, somewhat playing with it, but maybe the beginning and end of Flowers For Algernon might count?

edited 14th Feb '11 8:42:45 AM by savage

Want to rename a trope? Step one: if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
suedenim Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl from Jet Dream HQ Since: Oct, 2009
Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl
#17: Feb 14th 2011 at 8:51:19 AM

My own Jet Dream Remix Comic thingies are basically Stylistic Suck too (well, they may be just plain Suck too, but I'll leave that for the reader to decide.)

Spinal Tap, maybe, to the extent that the band has a life outside the original movie?

edited 14th Feb '11 8:52:34 AM by suedenim

Jet-a-Reeno!
tbarrie Since: Jan, 2001
#18: Feb 14th 2011 at 10:18:29 AM

If anybody's still wondering how a non-show-within-a-show example could exist, today's Shortpacked is timely. The creator deliberately draws his characters with the same artistic quirks they're complaining about. I'd definitely call it this trope.

DRCEQ Since: Oct, 2009
#19: Feb 14th 2011 at 10:36:18 AM

Huh, I always thought the trope was about intentionally low quality artwork for the actual show itself. Like the animation from Cromartie High School or the art style in Shin Chan.

Jokubas Since: Jan, 2010
#20: Feb 14th 2011 at 3:33:19 PM

If this wants to stay Show Within a Show only, I suggest a rename. Stylistic Suck, to me, implies any time something is done badly on purpose. That doesn't have to be within an existing work. My mind's blank on any specific examples, but I know there definitely are some.

Iaculus Pronounced YAK-you-luss from England Since: May, 2010
Pronounced YAK-you-luss
#21: Feb 14th 2011 at 3:35:13 PM

We have a trope for examples of Stylistic Suck that aren't show-within-a-show - namely, They Plotted a Perfectly Good Waste.

edited 14th Feb '11 3:35:21 PM by Iaculus

What's precedent ever done for us?
captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#22: Jun 13th 2011 at 11:13:15 AM

Bump, what's going on with this trope

nzm1536 from Poland Since: May, 2011
#23: Jun 13th 2011 at 12:19:28 PM

Stylistic Suck is something bad done on purpose. There is quite a number of things like that, not only shows within shows. Certain Stealth Parodies and Deconstructive Parodies use this to riddicule things they attack

edited 13th Jun '11 12:20:11 PM by nzm1536

"Take your (...) hippy dream world, I'll take reality and earning my happiness with my own efforts" - Barkey
nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#24: Jun 13th 2011 at 12:22:34 PM

[up]Well the current definition is only about a Show Within a Show.

edited 13th Jun '11 12:23:13 PM by nuclearneo577

EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#25: Jun 13th 2011 at 12:26:37 PM

[up] And that makes the current definition wrong.


Total posts: 45
Top