Alternative Character Interpretation: This causes a lot of the broken bases. Every character gets one. Is Victor a Magnificent Bastard/Noble Demon without whom the show would be nowhere, or is he a Villain Sue whom the show would better off not having? Is Jack completely justified in constantly trying to regain his family, or is he a loser trying to hold on to something he really should abandon? Even minor characters canít avoid this: Is Esther a really good friend to Katherine, her employer, or is Esther an annoying idiot, or both?
Broken Base: Almost everything and everyone on this show. The only things that are not base breakers are the fact that The Young and the Restless is a soap opera that they watch and that random background puppet at Crisom Lights is creepy.
Draco in Leather Pants: Quite a few of the most popular characters started out as villains, including Victor, Nina, Phyllis, Michael, Kevin and Chloe. They turned out to be popular with viewers so they were retooled by writers to be more likable, albeit still with an edge.
When Stitch was revealed to have killed his father, not even one character outside his family even bothered to consider other circumstances, vilifying him on the deed alone.
When Sharon was believed to have murdered several young adults, only a small handful of people considered she had been framed, with everyone else insulting or suspecting her at every turn.
When Avery was attacked and ravaged in an alley, she not only suspected Joe- she successfully convinced everyone else (including police chief Paul) of her stance with little proof. The only person who bailed Joe was the same who did for Sharon.