Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic and its writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories with action, set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with cleverness, happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but writers could be found in all four quadrants - Creator/PaulCornell and Kate Roman were considered Rad/Frock, whereas Gary Russell or John Peel were more Trad/Gun writers.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic and its writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories with action, set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with cleverness, happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but writers could be found in all four quadrants - Creator/PaulCornell and Kate Roman Orman were considered Rad/Frock, whereas Gary Russell or John Peel were more Trad/Gun writers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic and its writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic and its writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories with action, set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with cleverness, happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can writers could be found in all four quadrants.quadrants - Creator/PaulCornell and Kate Roman were considered Rad/Frock, whereas Gary Russell or John Peel were more Trad/Gun writers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
To quote the trope description “ It only applies when there is no meaningful conflict because everyone is awful and the world sucks, and therefore there are no stakes for the audience. If people enjoy the work despite its tone, this trope does not apply.”
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* ArchivePanic / ContinuityLockOut: Practically every long-running section of the Expanded Universe ends up suffering from these.
to:
* ArchivePanic / ContinuityLockOut: ArchivePanic: Practically every long-running section of the Expanded Universe ends up suffering from these.
Deleted line(s) 18 (click to see context) :
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Some of the writers seem to make a point of undoing as many happy endings from the TV series as possible, as well as killing off TV characters. This is particularly an issue in the prose Seventh and Eighth Doctor novels, and latter-day Big Finish.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic and its writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set.set (this is analogous to the non-fandom-specific typology of fanfic writers as "more from" versus "more of"). On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ShipTease: Various expanded media have been freer at giving the Doctor romantic relationships or amplifying ship-teasing already in place on screen. For example, in the BBC Books novels, the Eighth Doctor gets married at one point; the Big Finish audios allowed ship-teasing between various incarnations of the Doctor and companions including a never-thought-of shiptease between the Fourth Doctor and Leela; and the 2015-2016 run of Titan Comics' Twelfth Doctor comic book was notable for cranking the {{UST}} between Clara and the Doctor UpToEleven.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, spectacle that would have never been possible on a BBC budget, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories in the era when they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that would have quite plausibly been made as normal TV stories from the era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that would have quite could plausibly have been made as normal TV stories from in the era where when they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that would have worked just as well as normal stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that would have worked just as well quite plausibly been made as normal TV stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The novel ''Harvest of Time'' involves the Doctor having to save various incarnations of the Master from the MonsterOfTheWeek, the Sild. One of those incarnations are female. [[spoiler:[[Recap/DoctorWhoS34E11DarkWater And wouldn't you know...]]]]
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: The novel ''Harvest of Time'' involves the Doctor having to save various incarnations of the Master from the MonsterOfTheWeek, the Sild. One of those incarnations are is female. [[spoiler:[[Recap/DoctorWhoS34E11DarkWater And wouldn't you know...]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The novel ''Harvest of Time'' involves the Doctor having to save various incarnations of the Master from the MonsterOfTheWeek, the Slid. One of those incarnations are female. [[spoiler:[[Recap/DoctorWhoS34E11DarkWater And wouldn't you know...]]]]
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: The novel ''Harvest of Time'' involves the Doctor having to save various incarnations of the Master from the MonsterOfTheWeek, the Slid.Sild. One of those incarnations are female. [[spoiler:[[Recap/DoctorWhoS34E11DarkWater And wouldn't you know...]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, formal experimentation, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that would have worked just as well as normal stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, formal experimentation, modernist or post-modernist experiments with form or style, or explicit exploration of sexual relationships; versus "Trads", who want works that would have worked just as well as normal stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; versus "[[LighterAndSofter Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, formal experimentation, or explicit sex scenes; versus "trads", who want works that would have worked just as well as normal stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; and "[[LighterAndSofter frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
to:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "rads", "Rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, formal experimentation, or explicit sex scenes; exploration of sexual relationships; versus "trads", "Trads", who want works that would have worked just as well as normal stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier guns]]", Guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; and versus "[[LighterAndSofter frocks]]", Frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: The feuding among fans about which Expanded Universe works or sub-continuities are good and which ones are horrific parodies of the franchise that don't deserve to carry the name. The factions can be divided according to a scheme invented by the writer Gareth Roberts in the nineties, which has two orthogonal axes. On the one axis you have "rads", who like works which do things that would never happen on the TV show, whether that involves impossible scale escalation, formal experimentation, or explicit sex scenes; versus "trads", who want works that would have worked just as well as normal stories from the TV-show era where they're set. On the other hand, you have "[[DarkerAndEdgier guns]]", who want stories set on {{Crapsack World}}s in which everybody is a complete bastard including the Doctor and everyone except the regulars dies as gruesomely and graphically as possible, with it being very unclear at the end if anything good might have been achieved; and "[[LighterAndSofter frocks]]", who want stories with happy endings and lots of jokes. There is a slight bias towards the Rads-Guns and Trads-Frocks regions of the graph, but significant numbers of fans can be found in all four quadrants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: The novel ''Harvest of Time'' involves the Doctor having to save various incarnations of the Master from the MonsterOfTheWeek, the Slid. One of those incarnations are female. [[spoiler:[[Recap/DoctorWhoS34E11DarkWater And wouldn't you know...]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
'''WARNING! THERE MAY BE UNMARKED SPOILERS!'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Some of the writers seem to make a point of undoing as many happy endings from the TV series as possible, as well as killing of existing characters. This is particularly an issue in the prose Seventh and Eighth Doctor novels, and latter-day Big Finish.
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Some of the writers seem to make a point of undoing as many happy endings from the TV series as possible, as well as killing of existing off TV characters. This is particularly an issue in the prose Seventh and Eighth Doctor novels, and latter-day Big Finish.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Seems to be the favourite thing of the writers to undo as many happy endings from the TV series as possible, as well as killing of existing characters.
----
----
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Seems to be the favourite thing Some of the writers seem to undo make a point of undoing as many happy endings from the TV series as possible, as well as killing of existing characters.
----characters. This is particularly an issue in the prose Seventh and Eighth Doctor novels, and latter-day Big Finish.
----
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: Seems to be the favourite thing of the writers to undo as many happy endings from the TV series as possible, as well as killing of existing characters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
!!Pages for individual parts of the Expanded Universe:
Changed line(s) 12,13 (click to see context) from:
!! Tropes shared by most parts of the Expanded Universe.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!! Tropes shared by most parts of the Expanded Universe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ArchivePanic / ContinuityLockOut: Practically every long-running section of the Expanded Universe ends up suffering from these.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* YMMV/VirginNewAdventures
to:
* YMMV/VirginNewAdventuresYMMV/DoctorWhoNewAdventures
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,13 (click to see context) from:
----
!![=YMMVs=] in ''{{Doctor Who|Expanded Universe}}'' animation:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: The Shalka Doctor to the rest of them.
* RetroactiveRecognition: DavidTennant as a one-line cameo in ''Scream of the Shalka''.
!![=YMMVs=] in ''{{Doctor Who|Expanded Universe}}'' animation:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: The Shalka Doctor to the rest of them.
* RetroactiveRecognition: DavidTennant as a one-line cameo in ''Scream of the Shalka''.
to:
!![=YMMVs=] in ''{{Doctor Who|Expanded Universe}}'' animation:
*
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV sinkhole
Changed line(s) 10,11 (click to see context) from:
!!{{YMMV}}s in ''{{Doctor Who|Expanded Universe}}'' animation:
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
%% YMMV/DaleksInvasionEarth2150AD
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* YMMV/DrWhoAndTheDaleks
%% YMMV/DaleksInvasionEarth2150AD
%% YMMV/DaleksInvasionEarth2150AD
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* YMMV/DoctorWhoMagazine
Added DiffLines:
** YMMV/{{Gallifrey}}
Added DiffLines:
** YMMV/BerniceSummerfield
* YMMV/EighthDoctorAdventures
** YMMV/FactionParadox
* YMMV/EighthDoctorAdventures
** YMMV/FactionParadox
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: The Shalka Doctor to the rest of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* YMMV/BigFinishDoctorWho
* YMMV/VirginNewAdventures
----
* YMMV/VirginNewAdventures
----
