In my opinion, it is clear that Hancock is trying to eliminate any legitimate sympathy for Chris.
Eat bread, make sandwiches, know what I'm saying?Right, I agree. Whether or not you believe Chris or not, the post came off as very one-sided.
Just rewrote the Creator Breakdown to be as neutral as possible but it looks like editing has been shut down for a while. Probably for the best.
Editing wasn't shut down by the mods, it's somebody (brand new account) reposting the hate version and then spamming null edits to maintain the lock.
Seems fishy.
I stated in my reason that I had tried to make it non-biased due to the Broken Base. Cue it being edited in less then a minute into an Anti-Chris post with the only explanation being "removed errors" and then the page being locked down by the same guy spamming null edits.
Edited by Agronac919If you want to keep things non-biased around here, you can keep up the link (https://i.imgur.com/Ne2176D.jpg) that proves Stuckmann is a liar.
Yes it does. It proves that Stuckmann is backpedaling to deflect criticism of his 'rewrite' when he originally gloated about it being better than the work of the original screenwriters.
"The sad thing is, I wrote that in 20 minutes."
has become, "Guys, I wrote it in 20 minutes. Give me a break."
Okay guys. One last attempt to keep everyone happy.
I moved the proof link over to Lying Creator and toned down negative material from elsewhere.
However, I removed the claim that 'death threats were sent to his wife and father' under Broken Base, as this is both an unsubstantiated claim and not what he originally said. He stated that his wife was upset by negative comments (Boo-hoo), and that some cretin called his father and 'talked shit' to him. (Not cool, but again, unsubstantiated and not a death threat.)
Can we be friends again? I have cake.
On the Creator Breakdown part, do we have confirmation that he was lying about the movie script and that it was being shopped around Hollywood?
Hide / Show Replies