Discussion NetworkDecay / UniqueSituations

While the mainlining of the article is a point that no one should take issue with in itself. This article was basically the only open source place on the internet that went into very minute details on Cartoon Network's history. Something that other places such as Wikipedia and Fandom have gatekeepers that prefer to edit war with anyone who dares contradict their narrative, while this article very wordily aimed at presenting each point of view.

Removing it from this page to clean it up, is acceptable. But we should put that somewhere else on this site. On an Analysis or useful note or something. Otherwise T Vtropes is just as careless as countless other websites at producing these people who seem to obsess with the channel yet are pretty ignorant to its history. I think we can aim to fight that and clean up the page at the same time.

The sixth and seventh paragraphs of the Cartoon Network section— how are they related to the fact that a network created to show cartoons mostly airs cartoons nowadays? Quality concerns are valid in general, but I'm not sure they neccesariliy are relevant to the article.