I feel like this page should maybe describe Naughton's interpretation of the evidence as just that, his interpretation. Just because SSM was a poor documentary doesn't make the response a slam dunk.
Edited by bigbossdiegoEat bread, make sandwiches, know what I'm saying?
I feel like this page is heavily slanted in Naughton's favor without seriously assessing the claims he makes, especially about the seven countries study which, fun fact, was always about Seven countries. https://www.truehealthinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SCS-White-Paper.THI_.8-1-17.pdf
Additionally, a lot of Naughton's sources are LCHF diet advocates with questionable academic backgrounds and little in the way of credentials to their names. https://thescienceofnutrition.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/tom-naughton-is-a-fat-head/
I feel like this page should maybe describe Naughton's interpretation of the evidence as just that, his interpretation. Just because SSM was a poor documentary doesn't make the response a slam dunk.
Edited by bigbossdiego Eat bread, make sandwiches, know what I'm saying?