I swapped out the Rorschach example for Ozymandias. While Rorschach is really disturbed Veidt is still the evil one in this scenario. Rorschach not agreeing with the murder of 3 billion people can hardly be considered evil unable to comprehend good.
Was this a good edit to make or was I being a imbecile who doesn’t understand Alan Moore?
I swapped out the Rorschach example for Ozymandias. While Rorschach is really disturbed Veidt is still the evil one in this scenario. Rorschach not agreeing with the murder of 3 billion people can hardly be considered evil unable to comprehend good.
Was this a good edit to make or was I being a imbecile who doesn’t understand Alan Moore?
Y.20