Since Dungeons and Dragons has a Character page for the Classes - see [[ here]] - does anyone have any objection to giving Pathfinder a Classes page as well? After all, even the "iconic" classes (Barbarian, Bard, Cleric, Druid, Monk, Paladin, Fighter, Ranger, Rogue, Sorcerer, Wizard) are handled quite differently to how 3.5 does them, and then there's the unique classes like the Oracle, Witch and Gunslinger.
Anyone else think this page is getting long enough to justify splitting? I'm thinking maybe creating the following sub-pages:
- Iconics
- Adventure Path Characters
- Other Characters
- Gods
- Archfiends
I don't want to go ahead without any warning or opportunity to give feedback, though.
Groovy. Hide / Show RepliesShould we move the folders for the Adventure Path characters below the Gods folder, with a spoiler warning above them?
Since Dungeons and Dragons has a Character page for the Classes - see here - does anyone have any objection to giving Pathfinder a Classes page as well? After all, even the "iconic" classes (Barbarian, Bard, Cleric, Druid, Monk, Paladin, Fighter, Ranger, Rogue, Sorcerer, Wizard) are handled quite differently to how 3.5 does them, and then there's the unique classes like the Oracle, Witch and Gunslinger.