[004]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the record, however, Shaz\'s absence from the cover picture has not been explained by Kubo, and even if it is because Shaz is a figment of Gremmy\'s imagination, that doesn\'t mean Narita is correct about everything else. Look at the Kenpachi novel. Narita turned out to be wrong about why Kenpachi powers up as a result of fights - so there\'s definitely no guarantee that Shaz\'s absence from the chapter artwork is proof that Narita is 100% accurate in his short story.
to:
For the record, however, Shaz\\\'s absence from the cover picture has not been explained by Kubo, and even if it is because Shaz is a figment of Gremmy\\\'s imagination, that doesn\\\'t mean Narita is correct about everything else. Look at the Kenpachi novel. Narita turned out to be completely wrong about why Kenpachi powers up as a result of fights.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
For the record, however, Shaz\'s absence from the cover picture has not been explained by Kubo, and even if it is because Shaz is a figment of Gremmy\'s imagination, that doesn\'t mean Narita is correct. Look at the Kenpachi novel. Narita turned out to be wrong about why Kenpachi powers up as a result of fights - so there\'s definitely no guarantee that Shaz\'s absence from the chapter artwork is proof that Narita is 100% accurate in his short story.
to:
For the record, however, Shaz\\\'s absence from the cover picture has not been explained by Kubo, and even if it is because Shaz is a figment of Gremmy\\\'s imagination, that doesn\\\'t mean Narita is correct about everything else. Look at the Kenpachi novel. Narita turned out to be wrong about why Kenpachi powers up as a result of fights - so there\\\'s definitely no guarantee that Shaz\\\'s absence from the chapter artwork is proof that Narita is 100% accurate in his short story.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
For the record, however, Shaz\\\'s absence from the cover picture has not been explained by Kubo, and even if it is because Shaz is a figment of Gremmy\\\'s imagination, that doesn\\\'t mean Narita is correct. Look at the Kenpachi novel. Narita turned out to be wrong about why Kenpachi powers up as a result of fights - so there\\\'s definitely no guarantee that Shaz\\\'s absence from the chapter artwork is proof that Narita is 100% accurate in his short story.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
We haven\'t be troping the \'\'Spirits Are Always With You\'\' events as part of canon, so it\'s inconsistent to do one and not the other. That\'s why we need a consensus on what is going to be troped.
to:
We haven\\\'t been troping the \\\'\\\'Spirits Are Always With You\\\'\\\' events as part of canon, so it\\\'s inconsistent to do one and not the other. That\\\'s why we need a consensus on what is going to be troped.
