[003]
96.26.36.134
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Also, your proposed solution (adding a subheading under the existing) involving \'\'both\'\' tropes violates our rules on Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists.
to:
Also, your proposed solution (adding a subheading under the existing) violates our rules on Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Also, your proposed solution involving \'\'both\'\' tropes violates our rules on Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists.
to:
Also, your proposed solution (adding a subheading under the existing) involving \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' tropes violates our rules on Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
If the relationship qualifies for NotBloodSiblings, then the supertrope is not mentioned. You don\'t list supertropes when you have acceptable subtropes already listed.
to:
If the relationship qualifies for NotBloodSiblings, then the supertrope is not mentioned. You don\\\'t list supertropes when you have acceptable subtropes already listed.
Also, your proposed solution involving \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' tropes violates our rules on Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists.
Also, your proposed solution involving \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' tropes violates our rules on Administrivia/ExampleIndentationInTropeLists.
