Remark History

[003] 24.177.125.170

Changed line(s) 7 from:

n

Edit: Btw, more data has come out implying the 8 characters theory as the announcer has hidden clips that says \

to:

Edit: Btw, there\\\'s more implication for the 8 player smash theory, the announcer has hidden clips that says \\\"8-player Smash\\\": https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hTaS492JXgg

[002] 24.177.125.170

8th Oct '14 at 08:36:04 PM

Changed line(s) 5 from:

n

To be honest, it seems you\'re trying to make a limitation where there is none implied. Nothing says that the trophies are excluded from being used, we have examples of characters rising from cameo appearances in other games that can easily reflect in this one with the trophies, and finally, making two more trophies for these characters would hardly be that troublesome or taxing. The thing is, it can easily happen, and nothing that has been said is a noted limitation from them becoming playable in DLC.

to:

To be honest, it seems you\\\'re trying to make a limitation where there is none implied. Nothing says that the trophies are excluded from being used, we have examples of characters rising from cameo appearances in other games that can easily reflect in this one with the trophies, and finally, making two more trophies for these characters would hardly be that troublesome or taxing. The thing is, it can easily happen, and nothing that has been said is a noted limitation from them becoming playable in DLC.

Edit: Btw, more data has come out implying the 8 characters theory as the announcer has hidden clips that says \\\"8-player Smash\\\": https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hTaS492JXgg

[001] 24.177.125.170

8th Oct '14 at 08:32:33 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I\'m not going to get into a Ridley argument, the only thing I\'ll say is that Ridley is a poor example as you ignored what I said before: nothing implies one way or the other that trophies can\'t have ascended roles via DLC, Ridley has an implied role of being a boss as that\'s what has been shown. The former example could go either way depending on what the creator decides and it doesn\'t in one direction over the other, the other has something that hints in mostly one direction, so there\'s not a lot of flexibility with it.

to:

I\\\'m not going to get into a Ridley argument, the only thing I\\\'ll say is that Ridley is a poor example as you ignored what I said before: nothing implies one way or the other that trophies can\\\'t have ascended roles via DLC, Ridley has an implied role of being a boss as that\\\'s what has been shown. We don\\\'t have a line from Sakurai hinting at the prospect and we don\\\'t have previous examples in other games where their roles changed in DLC, so it\\\'s all assumptions at this point, unlike Ridley who has an implication going one way.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

Firstly, of course not everyone rose from being a cameo, but that wasn\'t the point, what the point is that some characters did rise from that. They went from not having a playable appearance to having one, so if that happened, why exactly is it impossible for the same to happen with trophies, which again, are basically cameos? Secondly, what would be the problem of having two more? It\'s not like the characters in question lack any other potential descriptions that can be made nor would making a trophy out of them twice over really be that taxing. For the former in particular, you\'re making it more restrictive then it really is as it\'s not that difficult to draw from another part of a character\'s story. With King K. Rool for instance, he has many different disguises and costumes that he\'s used over the years, refer to that. He seems to have a vast knowledge of combat due to his use of different weapons and abilities in the different games, why not refer to that as well, particularly since this is a fighting game? There\'s so much that they can say with these characters, the description of the one trophy is hardly the only thing that defines them.

to:

Firstly, of course not everyone rose from being a cameo, but that wasn\\\'t the point, what the point is that some characters did rise from that. They went from not having a playable appearance to having one, so if that happened, why exactly is it impossible for the same to happen with trophies, which again, are basically cameos? Secondly, what would be the problem of having two more? It\\\'s not like the characters in question lack any other potential description or lore that can be made nor would making a trophy out of them twice over really be that taxing. For the former in particular, you\\\'re making it more restrictive then it really is as it\\\'s not that difficult to draw from another part of a character\\\'s story. With King K. Rool for instance, he has many different disguises and costumes that he\\\'s used over the years, refer to that. He seems to have a vast knowledge of combat due to his use of different weapons and abilities in the different games, why not refer to that as well, particularly since this is a fighting game? There\\\'s so much that they can say with these characters that the description of the one trophy is hardly the only thing that defines them.

Discussion History WesternAnimation / BabyLooneyTunes