[002]
69.47.43.173
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s as if we\'ve gotten so scared of {{Zero Content Example}}s that now every bullet point must basically be a series summary in of itself. \
to:
It\\\'s as if we\\\'ve gotten so scared of {{Zero Content Example}}s that now every bullet point must basically be a series summary in of itself. \\\"In WCW, Miss Madness\\\'s gear had a cleavage window after she became Mona.\\\" If you remembered it was triangle shaped or how many inches across, more power to you but everyone who can\\\'t shouldn\\\'t have to search for images chest holes in clothing just to add an example like I did to \\\"prove\\\" Daffney wore some.
That example \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' detailed. No word about not following through and checking for cross wicks or the fact it never should have been removed in the first place?
That example \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' detailed. No word about not following through and checking for cross wicks or the fact it never should have been removed in the first place?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s as if we\'ve gotten so scared of ZeroContentExamples that now every bullet point must basically be a series summary in of itself. \
to:
It\\\'s as if we\\\'ve gotten so scared of {{Zero Content Example}}s that now every bullet point must basically be a series summary in of itself. \\\"In WCW, Mona\\\'s gear had a cleavage window during her Miss Madness phase.\\\" If you remembered it was triangle shaped or how many inches across, more power to you but everyone who can\\\'t shouldn\\\'t have to search for images chest holes in clothing just to add an example like I did to \\\"prove\\\" Daffney wore some.
That example \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' detailed. No word about not following through and checking for cross wicks or the fact it never should have been removed in the first place?
That example \\\'\\\'was\\\'\\\' detailed. No word about not following through and checking for cross wicks or the fact it never should have been removed in the first place?
