[001]
68.23.158.223
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*** \
to:
*** \\\"Tripping. Whenever a character dashes, they may, by [[RandomNumberGenerator completely random chance]], trip over and leave themselves vulnerable. While a disruptive annoyance in general, this commonly causes players to trip and get hit by attacks they would have avoided otherwise to no fault of their own.\\\" Tripping was so hated, [[http://kotaku.com/no-more-tripping-in-the-new-smash-bros-513187770 that Sakurai confirmed that random tripping will not return for the next game]]. \\\'\\\'Forced\\\'\\\' tripping, however, will stay if induced by an attack like Diddy\\\'s Banana Peels.
The part in quotation marks is kept on the Wiki. The rest isn\\\'t.
There is no way to infer from the context that this article is reliable enough. The original twitter itself is unfindable and cannot be verified. This actually means using it as proof won\\\'t work as random tripping was \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' said. Also, seeing as how Sakurai is often a LyingCreator at times, as he changed his mind of things among games, this even more vague statement doesn\\\'t mean much. He said no tripping will return. Clearly some tripping did, meaning that we can\\\'t take anything useful from it either.
It\\\'s best to just leave it off since people insist on using an unreliable article instead of just waiting and seeing.
...In addition, Diddy\\\'s Banana Peels weren\\\'t even confirmed. Hinted at. So we couldn\\\'t use that write-up either.
The part in quotation marks is kept on the Wiki. The rest isn\\\'t.
There is no way to infer from the context that this article is reliable enough. The original twitter itself is unfindable and cannot be verified. This actually means using it as proof won\\\'t work as random tripping was \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' said. Also, seeing as how Sakurai is often a LyingCreator at times, as he changed his mind of things among games, this even more vague statement doesn\\\'t mean much. He said no tripping will return. Clearly some tripping did, meaning that we can\\\'t take anything useful from it either.
It\\\'s best to just leave it off since people insist on using an unreliable article instead of just waiting and seeing.
...In addition, Diddy\\\'s Banana Peels weren\\\'t even confirmed. Hinted at. So we couldn\\\'t use that write-up either.
