Follow TV Tropes

Discussion History Main / BondCreatures

Go To

Changed line(s) 9 from:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \'\'\'on its own terms\'\'\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \
to:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \\\'\\\'\\\'on its own terms\\\'\\\'\\\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person should legitimately be able simply say \\\"Hitler was right\\\" in response to being informed that Hitler believed in their position without that making them bad or wrong.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of \'\'\'stealth advocacy for marginal positions\'\'\'. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their \'\'\'entire ideological position\'\'\' as an undisputable fact; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
to:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abusable concept of \\\'\\\'\\\'False Weight\\\'\\\'\\\'; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of stealth advocacy for marginal positions. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their \\\'\\\'\\\'entire ideological position\\\'\\\'\\\' as an undisputable fact; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \'\'\'on its own terms\'\'\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \
to:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \\\'\\\'\\\'on its own terms\\\'\\\'\\\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \\\"Hitler was right\\\" in response to being informed that Hitler believed in their position.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of \'\'\'stealth advocacy for marginal positions\'\'\'. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their entire ideological position \'\'\'as an undisputable fact\'\'\'; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
to:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of \\\'\\\'\\\'stealth advocacy for marginal positions\\\'\\\'\\\'. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their \\\'\\\'\\\'entire ideological position\\\'\\\'\\\' as an undisputable fact; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \'\'\'on its own terms\'\'\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \
to:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \\\'\\\'\\\'on its own terms\\\'\\\'\\\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \\\"Hitler was right\\\" in response to being informed that Hitler believed in their position.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of advocacy for such positions. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their entire ideological position as an undisputable fact; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
to:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of \\\'\\\'\\\'stealth advocacy for marginal positions\\\'\\\'\\\'. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their entire ideological position \\\'\\\'\\\'as an undisputable fact\\\'\\\'\\\'; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \'\'\'on its own terms\'\'\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \
to:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \\\'\\\'\\\'on its own terms\\\'\\\'\\\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \\\"Hitler was right\\\" in response to being informed that Hitler believed in their position.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
The Golden Mean Fallacy for the Protocols would be to say that in fact 50% of the Protocols must be are forged and 50% must be genuine simply because that\'s the middle ground.
to:
The Golden Mean Fallacy for the Protocols would be to say that in fact 50% of the Protocols must be forged and 50% must be genuine simply because that\\\'s the middle ground.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this is a form of advocacy for such positions. This is abused by dominant view ideologues by outright stating their entire position as a fact; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
to:
Everyone is ideologically biased and if a larger number of people agree with a statement then that can be as much reflection of their ideological bias as the smaller number disagreeing with the statement. What you are clutching at is the slippery and widely abused concept of false weight; that marginal positions should not be given equal coverage as dominant positions because this can be a form of advocacy for such positions. This concept is open to abuse by dominant view ideologues who outright state their entire ideological position as an undisputable fact; the article should give room for minority dissenting views even if they are not equally covered.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \'\'\'on its own terms\'\'\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \
to:
The crucial element here is that the position must be hateful, false and evil \\\'\\\'\\\'on its own terms\\\'\\\'\\\' and not simply because it was held by an evil person; this means that a person can legitimately simply say \\\"Hitler was right\\\" in response to being informed that Hitler believed in their position.
Top

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:

/

Media sources:

/

Report