[003]
92.27.55.220
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
There is a problem with this trope, in that it seems to be about two different things. One is generic overdramatisation of insignificant achievements in video games, the other is specific use by video games of the Engrish phrase \
to:
There is a problem with this trope, in that it seems to be about two different things. One is generic overdramatisation of insignificant achievements in video games, the other is specific use by video games of the Engrish phrase \\\"[X] get!\\\" to describe the acquiring of items.
Actually, come to think of it, that second usage is a meme, not a trope, isn\\\'t it?
Actually, come to think of it, that second usage is a meme, not a trope, isn\\\'t it?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
There is a problem with this trope, in that it seems to be about two different things. One is generic overdramatisation of insignificant achievements in video games, the other is specific use by video games of the Engrish phrase \
to:
There is a problem with this trope, in that it seems to be about two different things. One is generic overdramatisation of insignificant achievements in video games, the other is specific use by video games of the Engrish phrase \\\"[X] get!\\\" to describe the acquiring of items.
Actually, com to think of it, that second usage is a meme, not a trope, isn\\\'t it?
Actually, com to think of it, that second usage is a meme, not a trope, isn\\\'t it?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
There is a problem with this trope, in that it seems to be about two different things. One is generic overdramatisation of insignificant achievements in video games,the other is specific use by video games of the Engrish phrase \
to:
There is a problem with this trope, in that it seems to be about two different things. One is generic overdramatisation of insignificant achievements in video games, the other is specific use by video games of the Engrish phrase \\\"[X] get!\\\" to describe the acquiring of items.
