[004]
69.47.43.173
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have to really question this page\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales, which do not prove a work is bad in of themselves. If you need proof, some works on this page are successful both commercially and critically and are still called \
to:
I have to really question the merit of this page\\\'s continued existence. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales, which do not prove a work is bad in of themselves. If you need proof, some works on this page are successful both commercially and critically and are still called \\\"slumps\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have to really question this page\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales, which do not prove a work is bad in of themselves.
to:
I have to really question this page\\\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales, which do not prove a work is bad in of themselves. If you need proof, some works on this page are successful both commercially and critically and are still called \\\"slumps\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have to really question this page\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales. Of course we also have the QualityByPopularVote page, which seems to discourage this type of behavior.
to:
I have to really question this page\\\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales, which do not prove a work is bad in of themselves.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I have to really question this page\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales. Of course we also have the QualityByPopular vote page, which seems to discourage this type of behavior.
to:
I have to really question this page\\\'s merits. While I can confirm that many of these works are bad, I too have to question some that were placed here. It seems like a vehicle of ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike where you can hide behind critical reception or poor sales. Of course we also have the QualityByPopularVote page, which seems to discourage this type of behavior.
