[001]
74.82.64.145
Current Version
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
However, someone said something along the lines of \
to:
However, someone said something along the lines of \\\"Kalaong never states their OWN opinions, merely posting those of others,\\\" which was interesting. I propose the following (crack) theory:
Kalaong is Vathara, poorly criticizing Embers to either disguise the fact, get their ego stroked, or guide us into discussing the interesting bits of the work.
Thoughts...?
Foxfier: I don\\\'t recall any such moments, with Azula, which is why I will remain skeptical until I either find or am shown proof. Please do not take it personally.
However, consider the following: when Katara fights Azula, she tries to anger her like she would Zuko, and Azula comments internally that unlike Zuko, she doesn\\\'t have a hair-trigger temper. And, while she references \\\"a pit in her head\\\" or something like that, which is \\\"constantly hungry\\\" prior to Amaya\\\'s healing, we never once saw, nor see, her lose her temper so badly that she loses her words.
Further, dark dragons can lie, which regular dragons can not. Consequently, I\\\'d argue they would take to words easier than dragons would, as words make lying all that much easier.
Lastly, Azula and Zuko are children of dragon-children. As Vathara explained, their DNA is fucked. Up. Royally. (No pun intended.) They may have certain traits that are all dragon, and lack others. Right now, it seems to me that the \\\"word-lost\\\" gene has skipped Azula. She really was born lucky, huh?
