[003]
24.131.245.140
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not \
to:
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not \\\"plagiarized\\\". I wrote it myself, using Wikipedia (not simply cut and pasted) and my own knowledge as a resource. I was as concise and simple as I could be - you can only boil down information so far before the sentences start looking the same. If you think it was plagiarized, then how about rewriting it?
If you put it under \\\"needs more work\\\" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
If you put it under \\\"needs more work\\\" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not \
to:
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not \\\"plagiarized\\\". I wrote it myself, using Wikipedia (not simply cut and pasted) and my own knowledge as a resource. I was as concise and simple as I could be - you can only boil down information so far before the entrances start looking the same. If you think it was plagiarized, then how about rewriting it?
If you put it under \\\"needs more work\\\" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
If you put it under \\\"needs more work\\\" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not \
to:
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not \\\"plagiarized\\\". I wrote it myself, using Wikipedia and my own knowledge as a resource. If you think it was plagiarized, then how about rewriting it?
If you put it under \\\"needs more work\\\" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
If you put it under \\\"needs more work\\\" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
