Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History CreatorsPet / Literature

Go To

Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
I was told to provide examples for each of the four points on the page, and I did. Leia\'s actions were still out of character given the previous established lore, Corran\'s backstory still reads like wish fulfillment, and his \
to:
I was told to provide examples for each of the four points on the page, and I did. Leia\\\'s actions were still out of character given the previous established lore, Corran\\\'s backstory still reads like wish fulfillment, and his \\\"weakness\\\" with telekinesis is constantly reversed by his \\\"really really rare you guys\\\" energy absorption powers.
Injecting a character into another\\\'s work, and making them better (Less whiny, more together, more athletic, training with an already established character, and being only one of three people with a lightsaber) then every other character isn\\\'t a creator pet? Come on. I\\\'ve had to rewrite this thing four times already for flimsy reasons when there are far more poorly worded and exampled ones.
I\\\'ll leave it gone for now, but I don\\\'t see how it\\\'s any less bashing or wrong then anything else on that page.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
I was told to provide examples for each of the four points on the page, and I did. Leia\'s actions were still out of character given the previous established lore, Corran\'s backstory still reads like wish fulfillment, and his \
to:
I was told to provide examples for each of the four points on the page, and I did. Leia\\\'s actions were still out of character given the previous established lore, Corran\\\'s backstory still reads like wish fulfillment, and his \\\"weakness\\\" with telekinesis is constantly reversed by his \\\"really really rare you guys\\\" energy absorption powers.
Injecting a character into another\\\'s work, and making them better (Less whiny, more together, more athletic, training with an already established character, and being only one of three people with a lightsaber) then every other character isn\\\'t a creator pet? Come on. I\\\'ve had to rewrite this thing four times already for flimsy reasons when there are far more poorly worded and exampled ones.
I\\\'ll leave it gone for now, but I don\\\'t see how it\\\'s any less bashing or wrong then anything else on that page. and at least it follows the four points.
Top