[018]
216.99.32.42
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously inadequate image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And ensuring only illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' images remain on pages should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This image is being pulled again, and the issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously inadequate image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And ensuring only illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' images remain on pages should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This image is being pulled again, and the issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously inadequate image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And ensuring only illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' images remain on pages should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously inadequate image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And ensuring only illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' images remain on pages should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously inadequate image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously inadequate image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking around for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking to this page for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator, will be sticking to this page for far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t approved by a troper consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitude; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person and spare the needless attitide; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses others with snotty-sounding phrases such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks with ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over keeping crosswicks to ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over keeping crosswicks to ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page without a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image clearly does not illustrate any relevant concept on the page (in this case, destitution, squalor, homelessness, and a lack of money as related to povery). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around here far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). NO IMAGE will always be be much more preferable than keeping an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\". You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). No image must be FAR better than an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). No image must be FAR better than an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\".
You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). No image must be FAR better than an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). No image must be FAR better than an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus or anybody else trying to defend them.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over having crosswicks on ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For \'\'your\'\' information, you can\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \
to:
For \\\'\\\'your\\\'\\\' information, you can\\\'t talk down to strangers like a condescending dickhead who addresses people with a snotty-sounding phrase such as \\\"for your information\\\".
You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). No image must be FAR better than an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over crosswicks to ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
You want to make a point about some \\\"rule\\\" (although I thought here, we stuck to far less rigid \\\'\\\'guidelines\\\'\\\'), you can outline it to me like a totally mature person; I\\\'ll listen to you all the same.
That said, \\\"Keep Until a Better Suggestion is Offered\\\" should NOT be an applicable \\\'\\\'guideline\\\'\\\' if the image is clearly does not illustrate any concept on the page (in this case, poverty). No image must be FAR better than an obviously non-illustrative one which serves no beneficial purpose. Moreover, if that image being removed \\\'\\\'also\\\'\\\' wasn\\\'t offered by a consensus in the first place, then it surely must be within my rights as this page\\\'s creator and principal curator to remove an obviously bad image myself; as far as this page is concerned, I, as the page creator and curator will be sticking around this page far longer than anybody putting terrible images on the page that never had a consensus.
And being an illustrative, \\\'\\\'relevant\\\'\\\' image should always take up precedent over crosswicks to ImageSource.
In any case, this page now has a far better image that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' actually illustrative of poverty that was picked by consensus. This issue is resolved.
