[002]
216.99.32.42
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I completely agree with NanoMoose on this. There isn\'t actually any objective evidence for Booker and Elizabeth. The only evidence is that, well, some people shipped them. I wouldn\'t disagree that the shipping \'\'potential\'\' is there, in that they get along well and are both good-looking, but as far as any evidence? Going as far to say it \'\'fumbled\'\'? I don\'t buy it.
to:
I completely agree with [=NanoMoose=] on this. There isn\\\'t actually any objective evidence for Booker and Elizabeth. The only evidence is that, well, some people shipped them. I wouldn\\\'t disagree that the shipping \\\'\\\'potential\\\'\\\' is there, in that they get along well and are both good-looking, but as far as any evidence? Going as far to say it \\\'\\\'fumbled\\\'\\\'? I don\\\'t buy it.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
It\'s simply the presumption of the audience on how a story usually goes rather than anything concrete and present in the work. Essentially, you might call it a \'\'subversion\'\' of RelationshipWritingFumble. Not in a literal, write-that-down sense, but still.
to:
It\\\'s simply the presumption of the audience on how a story usually goes rather than anything concrete and present in the work. Essentially, you might call it a \\\'\\\'subversion\\\'\\\' of RelationshipWritingFumble. Not in a literal, write-that-down sense, but still.
As far as {{YMMV}}-anything-goes: yes, there can be a certain amount of dissention, but no, we don\\\'t put up any entry anyone feels like adding because it\\\'s {{YMMV}}. There should be a logical argument behind why it\\\'s there, and if there\\\'s contention, it comes down to consensus and a good argument.
As far as {{YMMV}}-anything-goes: yes, there can be a certain amount of dissention, but no, we don\\\'t put up any entry anyone feels like adding because it\\\'s {{YMMV}}. There should be a logical argument behind why it\\\'s there, and if there\\\'s contention, it comes down to consensus and a good argument.
