Changed line(s) 1 from:
I completely agree with NanoMoose on this. There isn\'t actually any objective evidence for Booker and Elizabeth. The only evidence is that, well, some people shipped them. I wouldn\'t disagree that the shipping \'\'potential\'\' is there, in that they get along well and are both good-looking, but as far as any evidence? Going as far to say it \'\'fumbled\'\'? I don\'t buy it.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
It\'s simply the presumption of the audience on how a story usually goes rather than anything concrete and present in the work. Essentially, you might call it a \'\'subversion\'\' of RelationshipWritingFumble. Not in a literal, write-that-down sense, but still.