[004]
OnTheHill
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"Even when they have a \\\'serious dilemma\\\' as you put it, the show\\\'s almost always perfectly clear about what\\\'s the right choice.\\\"
Except that it isn\\\'t. For every decision that it unambiguously declares to be right (not driving a drill into your enemy\\\'s face while he\\\'s buried in rock) there is another that it leaves open to interpretation (Wheeljack\\\'s behavior; Bulkhead beating the clone to death) or declares to be wrong, but a means to an end (the spark extractor.)
And \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' is where we\\\'re going in circles. I\\\'ve just handed you three pieces of evidence as they were presented in the show. Are you going to take them seriously, or make excuses based on personal opinion and then say I\\\'ve presented you with no evidence?
Except that it isn\\\'t. For every decision that it unambiguously declares to be right (not driving a drill into your enemy\\\'s face while he\\\'s buried in rock) there is another that it leaves open to interpretation (Wheeljack\\\'s behavior; Bulkhead beating the clone to death) or declares to be wrong, but a means to an end (the spark extractor.)
And \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' is where we\\\'re going in circles. I\\\'ve just handed you three pieces of evidence as they were presented in the show. Are you going to take them seriously, or make excuses based on personal opinion and then say I\\\'ve presented you with no evidence?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"Even when they have a \\\'serious dilemma\\\' as you put it, the show\\\'s almost always perfectly clear about what\\\'s the right choice.\\\"
Except that it isn\\\'t. For every decision that it unambiguously declares to be right (not driving a drill into your enemy\\\'s face while he\\\'s buried in rock) there is another that it leaves open to interpretation (Wheeljack\\\'s behavior; Bulkhead beating the clone to death) or declares to be wrong, but a means to an end (the spark extractor.)
And \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' is where we\\\'re going in circles. I\\\'ve just presented you with three pieces of evidence as they were presented in the show. Are you going to take them seriously, or make excuses based on personal opinion and then say I\\\'ve presented you with no evidence?
Except that it isn\\\'t. For every decision that it unambiguously declares to be right (not driving a drill into your enemy\\\'s face while he\\\'s buried in rock) there is another that it leaves open to interpretation (Wheeljack\\\'s behavior; Bulkhead beating the clone to death) or declares to be wrong, but a means to an end (the spark extractor.)
And \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' is where we\\\'re going in circles. I\\\'ve just presented you with three pieces of evidence as they were presented in the show. Are you going to take them seriously, or make excuses based on personal opinion and then say I\\\'ve presented you with no evidence?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"Even when they have a \\\'serious dilemma\\\' as you put it, the show\\\'s almost always perfectly clear about what\\\'s the right choice.\\\"
Except that it isn\\\'t. For every decision that it unambiguously declares to be right (not driving a drill into your enemy\\\'s face while he\\\'s buried in rock) there is another that it leaves open to interpretation (leaving Starscream supporting the stone; Bulkhead beating the clone to death) or declares to be wrong, but a means to an end (the spark extractor.)
And \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' is where we\\\'re going in circles. I\\\'ve just presented you with three pieces of evidence as they were presented in the show. Are you going to take them seriously, or make excuses based on personal opinion and then say I\\\'ve presented you with no evidence?
Except that it isn\\\'t. For every decision that it unambiguously declares to be right (not driving a drill into your enemy\\\'s face while he\\\'s buried in rock) there is another that it leaves open to interpretation (leaving Starscream supporting the stone; Bulkhead beating the clone to death) or declares to be wrong, but a means to an end (the spark extractor.)
And \\\'\\\'this\\\'\\\' is where we\\\'re going in circles. I\\\'ve just presented you with three pieces of evidence as they were presented in the show. Are you going to take them seriously, or make excuses based on personal opinion and then say I\\\'ve presented you with no evidence?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Alright, this is always a contentious entry, and it may be better just to leave it out while the game is fresh in people\'s minds and tempers are running hot. But: For those that have an issue with this, is there a way that it can be changed that would make you find this entry more acceptable?
to:
Alright, this is always a contentious entry, and it may be better just to leave it out while the game is fresh in people\\\'s minds and tempers are running hot. But: for those that have an issue with this, is there a way that it can be changed that would make you find this entry more acceptable?
