Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That kind of thing does happen from time to time. There isn\'t a general revert button (only [[KnowTheStaff the moderators have access to it), so you have to either do it manually or send a request to them through the \
to:
That kind of thing does happen from time to time. There isn\\\'t a general revert button (only [[KnowTheStaff the moderators]] have access to it), so you have to either do it manually or send a request to them through the \\\"this article needs mod assistance with...\\\" box under \\\"tools\\\" on the main wiki page.
Anyway, welcome to TVT and happy editing! You may wish to take a look at WikipediaSyntaxer, by the way.
Anyway, welcome to TVT and happy editing! You may wish to take a look at WikipediaSyntaxer, by the way.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t think examples like Taylor Swift or the opening to the Very Crappy Christmas episode of South Park fit this trope. This trope is about works that forsake good plots, interesting characters, good writing, etc. for the sake of being cute. Extreme cuteness in and of itself is not enough for a work to be this trope (hence, for example, Chuck Jones\' Pussyfoot series of cartoons actually being aversions rather than trope players - they\'re extremely cute but also have great writing, witty humor, etc.).
to:
I don\\\'t think examples like Taylor Swift or the opening to the Very Crappy Christmas episode of South Park belong on this list. Extreme cuteness alone is not enough for a work to be this trope. It needs to be \\\"excessively\\\" cute - meaning cute at the expense of good writing, interesting characters, good plots, etc. Hence, for example, Chuck Jones\\\' Pussyfoot series of cartoons actually being aversions rather than trope players. They\\\'re extremely cute but also have great writing, witty humor, etc. So they don\\\'t fall into this trope the way, for example, some of the Pebbles scenes on The Flintstones tend to.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t think examples like Taylor Swift or the opening to the Very Crappy Christmas episode of South Park fit this trope. This trope is about works that forsake good plots, interesting characters, good writing, etc. for the sake of being adorable. Simply being cute and cuddly is not enough for a work to be this trope (hence, for example, Chuck Jones\' Pussyfoot series of cartoons actually being aversions rather than trope players).
to:
I don\\\'t think examples like Taylor Swift or the opening to the Very Crappy Christmas episode of South Park fit this trope. This trope is about works that forsake good plots, interesting characters, good writing, etc. for the sake of being cute. Extreme cuteness in and of itself is not enough for a work to be this trope (hence, for example, Chuck Jones\\\' Pussyfoot series of cartoons actually being aversions rather than trope players - they\\\'re extremely cute but also have great writing, witty humor, etc.).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not sure examples like Taylor Swift or the opening to the Very Crappy Christmas episode of South Park fit this trope. This trope is about works that forsake good plots, interesting characters, good writing, etc. for the sake of being adorable. Simply being cute and cuddly is not enough for a work to be this trope (hence, for example, Chuck Jones\' Pussyfoot series of cartoons actually being aversions rather than trope players).
to:
I don\\\'t think examples like Taylor Swift or the opening to the Very Crappy Christmas episode of South Park fit this trope. This trope is about works that forsake good plots, interesting characters, good writing, etc. for the sake of being adorable. Simply being cute and cuddly is not enough for a work to be this trope (hence, for example, Chuck Jones\\\' Pussyfoot series of cartoons actually being aversions rather than trope players).
