Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / MemoryTropes

Go To

[005] SamMax Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
After a few months, I finally had the time to put him on the list, and then somebody removed him. I don\'t know why he \'\'wouldn\'t\'\' qualify, considering everything I\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows except the fellow who removed the entry?
to:
After a few months, I finally had the time to put him on the list, and then somebody removed him. I don\\\'t know why he \\\'\\\'wouldn\\\'t\\\'\\\' qualify, considering everything I\\\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\\\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\\\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
After a few months, I finally had the time to put him on the list, and then somebody removed him. I don\'t know why he \'\'wouldn\'t\'\' qualify, considering everything I\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
to:
After a few months, I finally had the time to put him on the list, and then somebody removed him. I don\\\'t know why he \\\'\\\'wouldn\\\'t\\\'\\\' qualify, considering everything I\\\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\\\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\\\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows except the fellow who removed the entry?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
After a few monts, I finally had the time to put him in, ad then somebody removed him. I don\'t know why he \'\'wouldn\'t\'\' qualify, considering everything I\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
to:
After a few months, I finally had the time to put him on the list, and then somebody removed him. I don\\\'t know why he \\\'\\\'wouldn\\\'t\\\'\\\' qualify, considering everything I\\\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\\\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\\\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
After a few monts, I finally had the time to put him in, ad then somebody removed him. I don\'t know why he \'\'wouldn\'t\'\' qualify, considering everything I\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
to:
After a few monts, I finally had the time to put him on the list, and then somebody removed him. I don\\\'t know why he \\\'\\\'wouldn\\\'t\\\'\\\' qualify, considering everything I\\\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\\\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\\\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Somebody removed him. I don\'t know why he \'\'wouldn\'t\'\' qualify, considering everything I\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
to:
After a few monts, I finally had the time to put him in, ad then somebody removed him. I don\\\'t know why he \\\'\\\'wouldn\\\'t\\\'\\\' qualify, considering everything I\\\'ve found of reactions to Many Hands\\\' work was overwhelmingly negative. Though it\\\'s more than likely that my entry just simply suffered from BadWriting. Who knows?
Top