[006]
ashlay
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\'s \
to:
I\\\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\\\'s \\\"other choice\\\" in that situation? Also hero isn\\\'t being manipulated at all in 2 of those plans, I could just go pick out some more if you don\\\'t like 2 and 4.
The main point your interpretation directly contradicts lines in the definition. Unless you actually do have an example of a TheGoodGuysAlwaysWin BatmanGambit that does agree with your interpretation. Or we could argue again about how an UnwittingPawn isn\\\'t required, I thought you\\\'d already conceded that point.
The main point your interpretation directly contradicts lines in the definition. Unless you actually do have an example of a TheGoodGuysAlwaysWin BatmanGambit that does agree with your interpretation. Or we could argue again about how an UnwittingPawn isn\\\'t required, I thought you\\\'d already conceded that point.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\'s \
to:
I\\\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\\\'s \\\"other choice\\\" in that situation? Also hero isn\\\'t being manipulated at all in 2 of those plans, I could just go pick out some more if you don\\\'t like 2 and 4.
The main point your interpretation directly contradicts lines in the definition. Unless you actually do have an example of a TheGoodGuysAlwaysWin BatmanGambit that does agree with your interpretation.
The main point your interpretation directly contradicts lines in the definition. Unless you actually do have an example of a TheGoodGuysAlwaysWin BatmanGambit that does agree with your interpretation.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\'s \
to:
I\\\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\\\'s \\\"other choice\\\" in that situation? Also hero isn\\\'t being manipulated at all in 2 of those plans, I could just go pick out some more if you don\\\'t like 2 and 4.
The main point your interpretation directly contradicts lines in the definition. Unless you actually do have an example of a HeroAlwaysWins BatmanGambit that does agree with your interpretation.
The main point your interpretation directly contradicts lines in the definition. Unless you actually do have an example of a HeroAlwaysWins BatmanGambit that does agree with your interpretation.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\'s \
to:
I\\\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\\\'s \\\"other choice\\\" in that situation? Also hero isn\\\'t being manipulated at all in 2 of those plans, I could just go pick out some more if you don\\\'t like 2 and 4.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\'s \
to:
I\\\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\\\'s \\\"other choice\\\" in that situation? Also hero isn\\\'t being manipulated at all in 2 of those examples, I could just go pick out some more if you don\\\'t like 2 and 4.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\'s \
to:
I\\\'m confused, what do you see as Harry\\\'s \\\"other choice\\\" in that situation? Also hero isn\\\'t being manipulated at all in 2 of those examples, I could just go pick out some more if you don\\\'t like the other 2 and 4.
