[003]
cjenk415
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How can you have a topic titled \
to:
How can you have a topic titled \\\"Author Filibuster\\\" and not mention Ayn Rand\\\'s books? I\\\'d add something myself, but I haven\\\'t actually read them.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Technically speaking yes, it\'s a legitimate example.
It seems completely and utterly arbitrary to exclude non-japanese works and characters from this list. If there are no western examples, then the disclaimer is pointless, and if there are western examples, it hardly makes sense to exclude them from addition to this easily identifiable and universally understood trope.
It seems completely and utterly arbitrary to exclude non-japanese works and characters from this list. If there are no western examples, then the disclaimer is pointless, and if there are western examples, it hardly makes sense to exclude them from addition to this easily identifiable and universally understood trope.
to:
That\\\'s a legitimate, obvious, and seemingly textbook example in a non-asian work.
It seems completely and utterly arbitrary to exclude non-japanese works and characters from this list. If there are no western examples, then the disclaimer is pointless, as there are none to add. If there are western examples, it hardly makes sense to exclude them from addition to this easily identifiable and universally understood trope.
It seems completely and utterly arbitrary to exclude non-japanese works and characters from this list. If there are no western examples, then the disclaimer is pointless, as there are none to add. If there are western examples, it hardly makes sense to exclude them from addition to this easily identifiable and universally understood trope.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
It seems completely and utterly arbitrary to exclude non-japanese works and characters from this list. If there are no western examples, then the disclaimer is pointless, and if there are western examples, it hardly makes sense to exclude them from addition to this easily identifiable and universally understood trope.
to:
It seems completely and utterly arbitrary to exclude non-japanese works and characters from this list. If there are no western examples, then the disclaimer is pointless, and if there are western examples, it hardly makes sense to exclude them from addition to this easily identifiable and universally understood trope.
I don\\\'t know how to start a page action or anything, and I\\\'m not entirely sure what this situation warrants. I\\\'m not sure if I can just remove the disclaimer, or if some more bureaucratic footwork is necessary.
I don\\\'t know how to start a page action or anything, and I\\\'m not entirely sure what this situation warrants. I\\\'m not sure if I can just remove the disclaimer, or if some more bureaucratic footwork is necessary.
