[001]
MOD
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think half the editors would say: \
to:
I think half the editors would say: \\\"no, because he\\\'s not playing to win.\\\"
That\\\'s what I tried to suggest on the archived page, to define a clear direction and make it either
- Supertrope of TheScrub: \\\"It\\\'s not \\\'fun\\\' if you\\\'re not playing my way.\\\" whether it is coming from Simhead (Scrub) or Cheeser (tournament player/\\\"playing to win\\\"-guy as long as you ignore the ragequitting-part. Simheads make just as good ragequitters - i added that to PlayerArchetypes now - and people using everything available can have a lot of respect for the game. Just ask people that know everything about MvC2 after playing it for 10 years)
or
- \\\"Competitive is the only way\\\"-guy doesn\\\'t accept that some people just don\\\'t want to use everything the game has to offer. Definitely not a Simhead.
now it seems to me that one part of the editors here edit it to be the first and other editors turn it into the second and another group tries to turn it into TheScrub.
That\\\'s what I tried to suggest on the archived page, to define a clear direction and make it either
- Supertrope of TheScrub: \\\"It\\\'s not \\\'fun\\\' if you\\\'re not playing my way.\\\" whether it is coming from Simhead (Scrub) or Cheeser (tournament player/\\\"playing to win\\\"-guy as long as you ignore the ragequitting-part. Simheads make just as good ragequitters - i added that to PlayerArchetypes now - and people using everything available can have a lot of respect for the game. Just ask people that know everything about MvC2 after playing it for 10 years)
or
- \\\"Competitive is the only way\\\"-guy doesn\\\'t accept that some people just don\\\'t want to use everything the game has to offer. Definitely not a Simhead.
now it seems to me that one part of the editors here edit it to be the first and other editors turn it into the second and another group tries to turn it into TheScrub.
