Discussion History JustForFun / InspectorSpacetime

I think the idea is that when you have no evidence for or against the existence of X (be it Yahweh, Vishnu, Zeus, Russell\\\'s teapot or Atlantis) then the default position would be disbelief (=> \\\"agnostic\\\" atheism) yet faith requires no proof to begin with (=> \\\"agnostic\\\" theism). It usually portrays agnosticism as a stance on knowledge and a moot point in regard to belief.

* \\\'\\\'agnostic atheism, the belief that while no deity exists, it is not impossible that one does\\\'\\\'.
* \\\'\\\'agnostic theism, the belief that a God does exist, but that it is not certain\\\'\\\'.

I think the idea is that when you have no evidence for or against the existence of X (be it Yahweh, Vishnu, Zeus, Russell\\\'s teapot or Atlantis) then the default position is disbelief (=> \\\"agnostic\\\" atheism) yet faith requires no proof to begin with (=> \\\"agnostic\\\" theism). It portrays agnosticism as a stance on knowledge and a moot point in regard to belief.

editing...