[005]
DaibhidC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s also got monarchist slant that would raise eyebrows with many \'\'British\'\' historians.
to:
It\\\'s also got a bit of a monarchist slant that would raise eyebrows with many \\\'\\\'British\\\'\\\' historians.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \'\'British\'\' historians.
to:
It\\\'s also got monarchist slant that would raise eyebrows with many \\\'\\\'British\\\'\\\' historians.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \'\'British\'\' historians. \
to:
It\\\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \\\'\\\'British\\\'\\\' historians.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \'\'British\'\' historians. \
to:
It\\\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \\\'\\\'British\\\'\\\' historians. \\\"King George III was in many senses the glue that held the United Kingdom of England, Scotland and Ireland together\\\"? Not according to the Scots, who might have given up on getting Bonnie Prince Charlie back, but still resented the Hanovers. And the suggestion that the Americans were only upset with Westminster and not with their king doesn\\\'t gibe with the Declaration of Independence: \\\"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.\\\"
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \'\'British\'\' historians. \
to:
It\\\'s also monarchist to an extent that would raise eyebrows with many \\\'\\\'British\\\'\\\' historians. \\\"King George III was in many senses the glue that held the United Kingdom of England, Scotland and Ireland together\\\"? Not according to the Scots, who might have given up on getting Bonnie Prince Charlie back, but still resented the Hanovers. And the suggestion that the revolutionaries were only upset with Westminster and not with their king doesn\\\'t gibe with the Declaration of Independence: \\\"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.\\\"
