Discussion History Literature / InheritanceCycle

I think the title is just fine. It doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can apply to other sexual orientations, just like how you guys are saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can apply to girls. Both terms don\\\'t SOUND inclusive at face-value, but are used as such. Plus the term \\\"Heterosexual Life Partners\\\" has been used even before this site took notice of it.

Also: \\\"Note that despite the trope name, the characters in question are not necessarily both heterosexual.\\\" So they kind of explain it right there.

I think the title is just fine. It doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can apply to other sexual orientations, just like how you guys are saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can apply to girls. Both terms don\\\'t SOUND inclusive at face-value, but are used as such.

Also: \\\"Note that despite the trope name, the characters in question are not necessarily both heterosexual.\\\" So they kind of explain it right there.

I think the title is just fine, because it\\\'s one of those tropes whose name precedes this site. I believe it was first used in \\\"Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back\\\", but it could have been even older than that. The title doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can apply to other sexual orientations, just like how you guys are saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can apply to girls. Both terms don\\\'t SOUND inclusive at face-value, but are used as such.

Also: \\\"Note that despite the trope name, the characters in question are not necessarily both heterosexual.\\\" So they kind of explain it right there.

I think the title is just fine, because it\\\'s one of those tropes whose name precedes this site. I believe it was first used in \\\"Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back\\\", but it could have been even older than that. The title doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can apply to other sexual orientations, just like how you guys are saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can apply to girls. Both terms don\\\'t SOUND inclusive at face-value, but are used as such.

I think the title is just fine, because it\\\'s one of those tropes whose name precedes this site. I believe it was first used in \\\"Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back\\\", but it could have been even older than that. The title doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can apply to other sexual orientations, just like how you\\\'re saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can apply to girls. Both terms don\\\'t SOUND inclusive at face-value, but are used as such.

I think the title is just fine, because it\\\'s one of those tropes whose name precedes this site. I believe it was first used in \\\"Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back\\\", but it could have been even older than that. The title doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can apply other sexual orientations, just like how you\\\'re saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can apply girls. Both terms don\\\'t SOUND inclusive at face-value, but are used as such.

I think the title is just fine, because it\\\'s one of those tropes whose name precedes this site. I believe it was first used in \\\"Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back\\\", but it could have been even older than that. The title doesn\\\'t literally mean only heterosexuals of the same sex, and can include other sexual orientations, just like how you\\\'re saying that \\\"Bromance\\\" can include girls.