Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / InformedAttractiveness

Go To

[004] Barano Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Re: Barnaby. His marketing appeal in-universe is not simply that he\'s \
to:
Re: Barnaby. His marketing appeal in-universe is not simply that he\\\'s \\\"handsome.\\\" It\\\'s that he\\\'s the whole package: a dashing young hero. Meanwhile Kotetsu is a \\\"veteran past his prime\\\" who may be physically attractive (not that anyone is supposed to notice under the mask...) but he\\\'s lost his appeal regardless due to age and lack of success.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Re: Barnaby. His marketing appeal in-universe is not simply that he\'s \
to:
Re: Barnaby. His marketing appeal in-universe is not simply that he\\\'s \\\"handsome.\\\" It\\\'s that he\\\'s the whole package: a dashing young hero. Meanwhile Kotetsu is a \\\"veteran past his prime\\\" who may be physically attractive (not that anyone is supposed to notice under the mask...) but he\\\'s lost his appeal regardless.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Re: Barnaby. His marketing appeal in-universe is not simply that he\'s \
to:
Re: Barnaby. His marketing appeal in-universe is not simply that he\\\'s \\\"handsome.\\\" It\\\'s that he\\\'s the whole package: a dashing young hero. Meanwhile Kotetsu is a \\\"veteran past his prime\\\" who may be physically attractive (not that anyone is supposed to notice under the mask...) but he\\\'s lost his appeal regardless and ends up being marketed essentially as a sidekick.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh, so now it\'s totally objective fact, is it? No opinion there at all? That\'s a joke. It still reads like it came straight out of the Left-wing echo chamber, which means it spreads smears and ignores all credible nonpartisan study data and polls which of course annihilate their hateful smears and memes.
to:
Oh, so now it\\\'s totally objective fact, is it? No opinion there at all? That\\\'s a joke. It still reads like it came straight out of the Left-wing echo chamber, which means it spreads smears and ignores all credible nonpartisan study data and polls which of course annihilate their hateful smears and memes. I\\\'m not saying the page should necessarily include those things, but to make claims directly countered by ACTUAL facts and call that objective is... well, it\\\'s [[ConfirmationBias not intellectually honest]], to say the least. But that\\\'s too much to expect from Tropers, I guess.
Top