Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / HotMom

Go To

[002] mack Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1) The balance is that whoever wants to make their own analysis can do. If someone wants to make their own \
to:
1) The balance is that whoever wants to make their own analysis can do. If someone wants to make their own \\\"Sam is not a JerkSue\\\" analysis, then they should feel free to. I\\\'d actually welcome someone making that, as I\\\'ve never seen any rational explanation for her not being a JerkAssSue based on the tropes involved. I\\\'m actually thinking of changing the analysis format that exists for Sam to the typical Analysis format which is a long \\\'essay\\\' style with no headers.

2) Sam was done because there had been formatting troubles surrounding her character. First off was the move from the character page of certain traits (due to a misunderstanding over where they should be) to the {{YMMV}} page. Then when it was put onto the {{YMMV}} page, an issue was raised about the length of the entry with the depth in explaining how she fit those tropes and sub-tropes involved in being a CanonSue or JerkAssSue. This was a valid issue, so it was moved to a newly created Analysis page, and Carly\\\'s \\\"PuritySue\\\" followed with it. It was just that the existing Sam entry had depth due to it being looked at closer than Carly. If someone wants to create an analysis of how Freddie is an omega-male who would be better off going to school with Melanie than staying with Mrs. Benson, Sam and Carly then they can.

3) There\\\'s no need to create multiple pages. I have re-done the page to include folders. If someone wants to create their own analysis, they can have their own section by using the double exclamation point header and then continuing further.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Firstly, on the idea that CanonSue/JerkAss is \'negative\' I\'ll point to TropesAreTools. In this case, the tools used to build Sam\'s character have lead to this analysis when examined closer.
to:
Firstly, on the idea that CanonSue JerkAss is \\\'negative\\\' I\\\'ll point to TropesAreTools. In this case, the tools used to build Sam\\\'s character have lead to this analysis when examined closer.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1) The balance is that whoever wants to make their own analysis can do. If someone wants to make their own \
to:
1) The balance is that whoever wants to make their own analysis can do. If someone wants to make their own \\\"Sam is not a JerkSue\\\" analysis, then they should feel free to. I\\\'d actually welcome someone making that, as I\\\'ve never seen any rational explanation for her not being a JerkAssSue based on the tropes involved.

2) Sam was done because there had been formatting troubles surrounding her character. First off was the move from the character page of certain traits (due to a misunderstanding over where they should be) to the {{YMMV}} page. Then when it was put onto the {{YMMV}} page, an issue was raised about the length of the entry with the depth in explaining how she fit those tropes and sub-tropes involved in being a CanonSue or JerkAssSue. This was a valid issue, so it was moved to a newly created Analysis page, and Carly\\\'s \\\"PuritySue\\\" followed with it.

3) There\\\'s no need to create multiple pages. I have re-done the page to include folders. If someone wants to create their own analysis, they can have their own section by using the double exclamation point header and then continuing further.
Top