[002]
Evilest_Tim
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It is a fact that not everything a hypocrite says or does can be right at the same time; this is often used to write off \'\'anything\'\' a hypocrite says / does as a falsehood. I\'m just trying to get across that despite that not \'\'all\'\' of their actions / arguments can be correct is not reason in itself to dismiss any \'\'specific\'\' action / argument. I\'ve tried to clarify it more in the article.
to:
It is a fact that not everything a hypocrite says or does can be right at the same time; this is often used to write off \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' a hypocrite says / does as a falsehood. I\\\'m just trying to get across that despite that not \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' of their actions / arguments can be correct is not reason in itself to dismiss any \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' action / argument. I\\\'ve tried to clarify it more in the article, but really I was just trying to phrase it without all these damn forward slashes and hope people got what I meant.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It is a fact that not everything a hypocrite says or does can be right at the same time; this is often used to write off \'\'anything\'\' a hypocrite says as a falsehood. I\'m just trying to get across that despite that not \'\'all\'\' of their actions / arguments can be correct is not reason in itself to dismiss any \'\'specific\'\' action / argument. I\'ve tried to clarify it more in the article.
to:
It is a fact that not everything a hypocrite says or does can be right at the same time; this is often used to write off \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' a hypocrite says / does as a falsehood. I\\\'m just trying to get across that despite that not \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' of their actions / arguments can be correct is not reason in itself to dismiss any \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' action / argument. I\\\'ve tried to clarify it more in the article.
