Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Administrivia / ListOfShowsThatNeedSummary

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This has come up before. Here\'s what I said back then:
to:
This has come up before. Here\\\'s what I said back then ([[color:purple: and I am adding new points in purple]]:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Anonymous Mc Cartneyfan: Because music pages are harder to write. Odds are, at least one of these conditions holds:
to:
Because music pages are harder to write. Odds are, at least one of these conditions holds [[color:purple:for most tropers]]:
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
1. It\'s uncertain when this band or artist started producing.
2. It\'s uncertain when, or if, this band or artist finished producing. There may be albums that are effectively in Dis Continuity because the record company isn\'t promoting them. And musicians who can no longer get records released through major outlets often keep touring.
3. The band that needs a listing has had high turnover. There are a few bands that have had 100% turnover, in which case one must think carefully about what one is listing. (For instance, the Four Tops was a classic band in its time, but now is the same band In Name Only.) Likewise, one must determine whether The Band Minus The Face is worth covering.
4. For shorter-lived bands, little is known about them but the existence of their singles.
5. For some bands, Complaining About Shows You Dont Like is hard to avoid, justified or not. (I am trying to imagine a fair and balanced The Backstreet Boys entry.)
to:
# It\\\'s uncertain when this band or artist started producing.
# It\\\'s uncertain when, or if, this band or artist finished producing. There may be albums that are effectively in DisContinuity because the record company isn\\\'t promoting them. And musicians who can no longer get records released through major outlets often keep touring.
*** [[color:purple: Since people tend to cut works and creator articles if they don\\\'t have a certain amount of info at creation, anyone who creates such an article needs to have the relevant info at hand. The active years and discography are critical for musicians, but they are hard to cover accurately unless you are a fan.]]
# The band that needs a listing has had high turnover. There are a few bands that have had 100% turnover, in which case one must think carefully about what one is listing. (For instance, the FourTops was a classic band in its time, but now is the same band InNameOnly.) Likewise, one must determine whether TheBandMinusTheFace is worth covering.
# For shorter-lived bands, little is known about them but the existence of their singles. [[color:purple: At least for many of them. And when it\\\'s hard to get more than a stub\\\'s worth of info \\\'\\\'anywhere\\\'\\\'...]]
# For some bands, ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontLike is hard to avoid, justified or not. (I am trying to imagine a fair and balanced The Backstreet Boys entry.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It doesn\'t seem quite right to me to call out roles for NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent when the whole film is Not Even Bothering With the Language. Who cares if Harvey Keitel has a Brooklyn Accent when Judas wouldn\'t really speaking English anyway?
to:
It doesn\\\'t seem quite right to me to call out roles for NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent when the whole film is Not Even Bothering With the Language. Who cares if Harvey Keitel has a Brooklyn Accent when Judas wouldn\\\'t really speaking English anyway?

EDIT: Oh, wait, there is a comment about that at the end of the article… Should we remove the examples like that?
Top