Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / SlidingScaleOfAntiVillains

Go To

[004] ading Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Shouldn\'t this be just \
to:
Shouldn\\\'t this be just \\\"ScaleOfAntivillains?\\\" I mean, how could someone slide on the scale?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On the other hand you, a moderator, i.e. ideally supposed OnlySaneMan, explicitly stated \
to:
On the other hand you, a moderator, i.e. ideally supposed OnlySaneMan, explicitly stated \\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\'\\\' for my forgiveness\\\" right at the start (I mean, seriously, you used the word \\\'\\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\'\\\'... that doesn\\\'t exactly sound fairminded and reasonable), along with assorted \\\"pathetic\\\" (wouldn\\\'t that make your own extremely petty interferences be even more \\\"pathetic\\\"?), \\\"get help\\\", and \\\"house rules don\\\'t have to make sense, or be fairminded, and we don\\\'t bother with listening to anybody, dig it\\\" extremely conceited derogatory non-arguments, rather than get a thorough overview of the situation. How am I supposed to be able to find that sort of supposed authority reliable?

Regardless, I have never said anything I believe to be untrue, have never resorted to underhanded deceit or motivations of sheer spite, and consistently made extreme efforts in compromising. That some people don\\\'t like and try to quiet anything tiny fragment whatsoever going against and questioning the stream, says an awful lot more about them than about me. I have made an effort to behave honourably, and strained to adapt as far as I can.

Some others have definitely not, but I suppose that this is it for me. It is probably for the best to largely leave anyway. This place started to get to me, and I usually do have severe problems being concise when there are a lot of disjointed parts to process.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On the other hand you, a moderator, i.e. ideally supposed OnlySaneMan, explicitly stated \
to:
On the other hand you, a moderator, i.e. ideally supposed OnlySaneMan, explicitly stated \\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\'\\\' for my forgiveness\\\" right at the start (I mean, seriously, you used the word \\\'\\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\'\\\'... that doesn\\\'t exactly sound fairminded and reasonable), along with assorted \\\"pathetic\\\" (wouldn\\\'t that make your own extremely petty interferences be even more \\\"pathetic\\\"?), \\\"get help\\\", and \\\"house rules don\\\'t have to make sense, or be fairminded, and we don\\\'t bother with listening to anybody, dig it\\\" extremely conceited derogatory non-arguments, rather than get a thorough overview of the situation. How am I supposed to be able to find that sort of authority reliable?

Regardless, I have never said anything I believe to be untrue, have never resorted to underhanded deceit or motivations of sheer spite, and consistently made extreme efforts in compromising. That some people don\\\'t like and try to quiet anything tiny fragment whatsoever going against and questioning the stream, says an awful lot more about them than about me. I have made an effort to behave honourably, and strained to adapt as far as I can.

Some others have definitely not, but I suppose that this is it for me. It is probably for the best to largely leave anyway. This place started to get to me, and I usually do have severe problems being concise when there are a lot of disjointed parts to process.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Issues isn\'t exactly the right term. I have always been open with that I have assorted born disorders though, and have honestly processed an awful lot of impressions and experiences which need to be said. However, I am definitely sane, just very honest in my manner of processing and dissecting most types of input. People who adhere firmly to given ideologies, or have extreme contrary biases, recurrently tend to go overboard in their reactions to that.
to:
Issues isn\\\'t exactly the right term. I have always been open with that I have assorted born disorders though, and have honestly processed an awful lot of impressions and experiences which need to be said. However, I am definitely sane, just very honest in my manner of processing and dissecting most types of input, which in this case has largely been extremely chaotic, vicious, mean-spirited, hopeless, and in total intensely confusing. People who adhere firmly to given ideologies, or have extreme contrary biases, recurrently tend to go overboard in their reactions to my matter-of-fact attempts to make sense of the input though.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On the other hand you, a moderator, i.e. ideally supposed OnlySaneMan, explicitly stated \
to:
On the other hand you, a moderator, i.e. ideally supposed OnlySaneMan, explicitly stated \\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\'\\\' for my forgiveness\\\" right at the start (I mean, seriously, you used the word \\\'\\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\'\\\'... that doesn\\\'t exactly sound fairminded and reasonable), along with assorted \\\"pathetic\\\" (wouldn\\\'t that make your own extremely petty interferences be even more \\\"pathetic\\\"?), \\\"get help\\\", and \\\"house rules are LawfulEvil, dig it\\\" extremely conceited derogatory non-arguments, rather than get a thorough overview of the situation. I have never said anything I believe to be untrue, have never resorted to underhanded deceit or motivations of sheer spite, and consistently made extreme efforts in compromising. That some people don\\\'t like and try to quiet anything tiny fragment whatsoever going against and questioning the stream, says an awful lot more about them than about me. I have made an effort to behave honourably, and strained to adapt as far as I can. Some others have definitely not, but I suppose that this is it for me. It is probably for the best to leave anyway.
Top