[001]
PaulA
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
For what it\'s worth, I wasn\'t being arrogant or dismissive, I really just didn\'t understand where you were coming from with this. I was stuck in the human perspective, where \
to:
For what it\\\'s worth, I wasn\\\'t being arrogant or dismissive, I really just didn\\\'t understand where you were coming from with this. To me \\\"GodIsFlawed\\\" is only a trope because we have a baseline assumption that God is infallible, and Flynn\\\'s a fallible human being, so that baseline assumption isn\\\'t there.
It wasn\\\'t until you started emphasizing the distinction between \\\"human\\\" and \\\"User\\\" that I got the idea you were coming at it from the perspective of the Programs -- and then I remembered the scene in the original film where Tron asks Flynn for reassurance that there\\\'s a divine Plan, and Flynn has to break it to him that Users are just people too and are usually making it up as they go along -- and I got it: the Programs \\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\' have that baseline assumption that Users are infallible, so to them it \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a Discovery that the User is flawed.
It wasn\\\'t until you started emphasizing the distinction between \\\"human\\\" and \\\"User\\\" that I got the idea you were coming at it from the perspective of the Programs -- and then I remembered the scene in the original film where Tron asks Flynn for reassurance that there\\\'s a divine Plan, and Flynn has to break it to him that Users are just people too and are usually making it up as they go along -- and I got it: the Programs \\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\' have that baseline assumption that Users are infallible, so to them it \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a Discovery that the User is flawed.
