[010]
BritBllt
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The thing is, if we\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on. I\'d like to keep NoYay focused on the in-universe squicky pairings, but that\'d require either rewriting all the other Yay pages, or decoupling this one from them in spite of the name. Personally, I have no problem with the latter.
to:
The thing is, if we\\\'re already in the position of accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\\\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on. I\\\'d like to keep NoYay focused on the in-universe squicky pairings, but that\\\'d require either rewriting all the other Yay pages, or decoupling this one from them in spite of the name. Personally, I have no problem with the latter.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Also, it\'s linked in 229 articles and 707 inbound links. That\'s a lot of traffic.
to:
Also, it\\\'s linked in 229 articles with 707 inbound links. That\\\'s a lot of traffic.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
(I don\'t have much of a problem with the former either, but how likely is that? :P)
to:
(I don\\\'t have much of a problem with the former either, but how likely is that? :p)
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
(I have no problem with the former either, but how likely is that? :P)
to:
(I don\\\'t have much of a problem with the former either, but how likely is that? :P)
Changed line(s) 4 from:
to:
(I have no problem with the former either, but how likely is that? :P)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
^^ Right, which is why I said the description may need work.
to:
^^ Right, which is why I said the description/examples may need a lot of work.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The thing is, if we\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on. I\'d like to keep NoYay focused on the in-universe squicky pairings, but that\'d require either rewriting all the other Yay pages, or decoupling this one from them in spite of the name. Personally, I have no problem with the latter.
to:
The thing is, if we\\\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\\\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on. I\\\'d like to keep NoYay focused on the in-universe squicky pairings, but that\\\'d require either rewriting all the other Yay pages, or decoupling this one from them in spite of the name. Personally, I have no problem with the latter.
Also, it\\\'s linked in 229 articles and 707 inbound links. That\\\'s a lot of traffic.
Also, it\\\'s linked in 229 articles and 707 inbound links. That\\\'s a lot of traffic.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The thing is, if we\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on (even the name \
to:
The thing is, if we\\\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\\\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on. I\\\'d like to keep NoYay focused on the in-universe squicky pairings, but that\\\'d require either rewriting all the other Yay pages, or decoupling this one from them in spite of the name. Personally, I have no problem with the latter.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
^^Right, which is why I said the description may need work.
to:
^^ Right, which is why I said the description may need work.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The thing is, if we\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on (even the name \
to:
The thing is, if we\\\'re already in the position accepting the Yay pages as a subjective place to cheer on fetishy pairings, then this page fills a valid niche within that category. If we\\\'re complaining about this page as being too subjective and nattery, then the Yay pages in general all have the exact same thing going on (even the name \\\"yay\\\" suggests a partial view). I\\\'d like to keep NoYay focused on the in-universe squicky pairings, but that\\\'d require either rewriting all the other Yay pages, or decoupling this one from them in spite of the name. Personally, I have no problem with the latter.
