[010]
girlyboy
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added about 2 months ago, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited the line, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken, and none of the previous edits led to any flame wars.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added about 2 months ago, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited the line, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken, and none of the previous edits led to any flame wars.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added about 2 months ago, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited the line, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added about 2 months ago, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited the line, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added about 2 months ago, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added about 2 months ago, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added in late September, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added in late September, IIRC, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added in late September, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added in late September, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it so far, even though this is always a fairly active article. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added in late September, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" It was added in late September, and I haven\\\'t seen any flame wars about it. There was a couple of people who edited it, mostly to make it longer or elaborate on it in some way, but so far it seems you\\\'re the first person who wants to delete it outright, if I am not mistaken.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months, IIRC.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months, IIRC.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminists exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is B. \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is \\\"B. Straw Feminsts\\\" exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, where, exactly, is B. \
to:
Um, where, exactly, is B. \\\"Straw Feminsts\\\" exist IRL\\\" coming from? I thought the whole point was that no, as a matter of fact, they \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' exist IRL, again, just by definition. Extreme feminists may exist in real life (just like extreme \\\'\\\'anything\\\'\\\' may exists in real life), but the whole point is that they don\\\'t fit into this article, not being \\\'\\\'\\\"straw-\\\"\\\'\\\' anything.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months.
Age has bearing when your argument is that having this in the article \\\"adds fuel to the fire.\\\" So far this very discussion seems to be the first time this line has added any fuel to any fire, after being there for months.
