[001]
SchizoTechnician
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Where do you draw the line between valid, non-make-fun-able belief, and [[strike: Scientology]] the silly-but-taken-seriously stuff? Judging from the discussion regarding [[strike: Scientology]], at least one of the mods is even more vocal and active than \'\'me\'\' about pushing that line (I don\'t remember what he said exactly, but it was something like \
to:
Where do you draw the line between valid, non-make-fun-able belief, and [[strike: Scientology]] the silly-but-taken-seriously stuff? Judging from the discussion regarding [[strike: Scientology]], at least one of the mods is even more vocal and active than \\\'\\\'me\\\'\\\' about pushing that line (I don\\\'t remember what he said exactly, but it was something like \\\"all religion seems equally silly to me\\\", the context being why we couldn\\\'t single Scientology out for ridicule).
Everyone has a different definition of what constitutes \\\"I don\\\'t agree with this, but it makes enough sense that I respect the person who believes it\\\" and what constitutes \\\"this person is completely insane\\\", and a different position on the spectrum between those two extreme points regarding each specific set of beliefs.
I have no idea where I\\\'m going with this, but eh. Something about opinions being waay too different and better to avoid problems than to have those differring opinions of what makes sense and what doesn\\\'t clash.
Everyone has a different definition of what constitutes \\\"I don\\\'t agree with this, but it makes enough sense that I respect the person who believes it\\\" and what constitutes \\\"this person is completely insane\\\", and a different position on the spectrum between those two extreme points regarding each specific set of beliefs.
I have no idea where I\\\'m going with this, but eh. Something about opinions being waay too different and better to avoid problems than to have those differring opinions of what makes sense and what doesn\\\'t clash.
