[013]
SensuBean
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail that nobody on this page cared about, and definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban by Wikipedia standards) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, because of the horrible crime of being LiteralMinded anal-retentive, compulsively honest, and having a hard time to compress things, but doing so anyway, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail that nobody on this page cared about, and definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban by Wikipedia standards) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, because of the horrible crime of being LiteralMinded anal-retentive, compulsively honest, and having a hard time to compress things, but doing so anyway, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban by Wikipedia standards) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, because of the horrible crime of being LiteralMinded anal-retentive, compulsively honest, and having a hard time to compress things, but doing so anyway, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban by Wikipedia standards) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, because of the horrible crime of being LiteralMinded anal-retentive, compulsively honest, and having a hard time to compress things, but doing so anyway, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, because of the horrible crime of being LiteralMinded anal-retentive, compulsively honest, and having a hard time to compress things, but doing so anyway, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, because of the horrible crime of being LiteralMinded anal-retentive, compulsively honest, and having a hard time to compress things, but doing so anyway, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed.
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have told me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed \\\"as nobody would miss me\\\", been far more crude and incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have been free to tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed\\\" as nobody would miss me\\\", been far mor incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have been free to tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed\\\" as nobody would miss me\\\", been far mor incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have been free to tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed as noone would miss me, been far mor incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Regarding the unfounded accusations:
I had left the \\\"10%\\\" (ridiculous detail definitely not worth a thousandth of a ban) alone for CrypticMirror to change as she prefered.
I had completely reverted the recommendation page to previous format because she disagreed
I only kept the folders since the reason I took the time to add them in the first place, was I was told that those were preferred and standard by other users.
I make a continuous effort to modify or compress my text pieces when put into question.
I have given a _much_ greater amount of positive reviews than negative ones (10:1 ratio).
I have _definitely_ not been anywhere near unreasonable about the Ranma pages, and have consistently accepted Wandering Browser\\\'s compromise solutions.
And I have probably put a considerably greater effort into improving, compromising despite disagreeing, and playing trash-can than herself, but I draw the line at outright lying, deceit, or uncompromising censorship... and this despite that I probably have a _far_ harder time to be concise, understand what people mean or how they think, and trying to filter things down when people severely insult me... and whereas WanderingBrowser actually appreciated the effort, CrypticMirror simply made things up instead, and took advantage of that the moderator is usually too busy to check much into the matter, as he has hundreds of them all the time.
Comparatively some people here have been free to tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of some handicap, should be killed as noone would miss me, been far mor incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Comparatively some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, been far mor incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all...
Comparatively some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, been far mor incivil than myself, strived to censor my entirely valid input, or in this case outright lied about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but I defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning or context. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all... Comparatively some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way, and the stated entirely inaccurate reasons weren\\\'t important at all... Comparatively some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s somehow okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted, after which she immediately started to do various uncompromising edits that showcased that it was strictly a roundabout insincere path to get an inconveneience out of the way... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is a matter of fact summary, and an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Anyway, every single one of her accusations behind my back, while I was asleep, without informing me to give me a chance to defend myself, had false grounds, and were in fact directly contradicted... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so some people here have been free to can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, strive to censor my entirely valid input, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal with that kind of reasoning. It doesn\\\'t make any sense to me at all.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As far as I\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \
to:
As far as I\\\'m aware I do have the legal right to for once not play trash can, defend myself and present the matter as it actually occurred. That is not an \\\"attitude\\\" problem, that is an accumulated result of a series of consistent extremely underhanded events from various parties. It\\\'s the usual \\\"a whipped dog who starts to bark is the bad guy here\\\" \\\"moment 22\\\" or \\\"guilty until proven innocent\\\" argument, even though it does not always appear that way from a brief outward skim. Anyway, every single one of her accusations had false grounds... but I evidently don\\\'t have any human rights, so people can tell me that I\\\'m a blight on humanity because of my handicaps, should be killed on principle, or outright lie about me on every point, and that\\\'s okay, but defend myself even a little bit, and instant backlash and threats. I have no ideas whatsoever about how to even approach or deal that kind of reasoning.
