[002]
BritBllt
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
You wanted your points made in the article. I agreed and went ahead and added your points to the article. Instead of collaborating by editing in the changes you wanted made or, if you\'re determined to edit by consenses, saying something polite and constructive like \
to:
You wanted your points made in the article. I agreed and went ahead and added your points to the article. Instead of collaborating by editing in the changes you wanted made or, if you\\\'re really determined to edit by consensus, saying something polite and constructive like \\\"that\\\'s a good start, but can we add something about the continuity,\\\" you assigned a POV to me that I never expressed just so you could argue about it, all because the edit I made on your behalf wasn\\\'t \\\'\\\'exactly\\\'\\\' the way you wanted it. That sequence of events says it all.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
You wanted your points made in the article. I agreed and went ahead and added your points to the article. Instead of collaborating by editing the changes you wanted made or saying something polite and constructive like \
to:
You wanted your points made in the article. I agreed and went ahead and added your points to the article. Instead of collaborating by editing in the changes you wanted made or, if you\\\'re determined to edit by consenses, saying something polite and constructive like \\\"that\\\'s a good start, but can we add something about the continuity,\\\" you assigned a POV to me that I never expressed just so you could argue about it, all because the edit I made on your behalf wasn\\\'t \\\'\\\'exactly\\\'\\\' the way you wanted it. That sequence of events says it all.
